量子电子学报, 2001, 18 (1): 82, 网络出版: 2006-05-15  

单波长与双波长探测平流层臭氧的比较

Intercomparison of Single-wavelength DIAL and Two-wavelength DIAL Stratospheric Ozone Measurements
作者单位
中国科学院安徽光学精密机械研究所大气光学重点实验室,合肥,230031
摘要
本文利用安徽光机所的多波长紫外差分吸收激光雷达[1]/的探测结果,在平流层背景气溶胶情况下,比较单波长(308nm)距离差分方法和双波长(308-355nm)差分方法受气溶胶和温度影响的结果。比较结果表明:单波长距离差分方法受温度变化和气溶胶的不均匀影响较大,双波长差分方法受影响较小,两种方法的处理结果有明显差异。30天的平均结果表明:在19km以下,单波长结果与双波长结果相差较大;在19~35km高度区间,单波长结果与双波长结果的相对误差小于12%。
Abstract
In this paper, datumobtained by multiwavelength UV-DIAL lidar at Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanicsare used to compare the effects of temperature and aerosol on singlewavelength (308 nm)and two-wavelength(308-355 nm) DIAL with backgr ound stratospheric aerosol. Results of twomethods show that the effects are larger for single-wavelength DIAL but less fortwo-wavelength DIAL. Calculated results of two methods are different distinctly. A meanvalue of 30 days show difference of ozone results measured by single-wavelength andtwowavelength is comparably large below 19 km altitude. Relative errors ofsingle-wavelength to two-wavelength are less than 12% from the height of 19 km to 35 km.

胡顺星, 胡欢陵, 吴永华, 周军. 单波长与双波长探测平流层臭氧的比较[J]. 量子电子学报, 2001, 18(1): 82. 胡顺星, 胡欢陵, 吴永华, 周军. Intercomparison of Single-wavelength DIAL and Two-wavelength DIAL Stratospheric Ozone Measurements[J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2001, 18(1): 82.

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!