强激光与粒子束, 2011, 23 (4): 871, 网络出版: 2011-05-26   

激光推进冲量耦合系数测量方法比较

Comparison of measurement methods of impulse coupling coefficient for laser propulsion
作者单位
1 中国科学院 电子学研究所, 北京 100190
2 中国科学院 研究生院, 北京 100049
摘要
针对测量冲量耦合系数的水平导轨法和冲击摆法, 分别进行了误差计算和实验研究。计算结果表明:水平导轨测量法的相对误差(4.6%)略小于冲击摆测量法的相对误差(6.1%), 其中位移参数和最大摆角的测量精度对于相对误差的影响最大。实验结果表明:两种方法的测量结果基本一致, 冲量耦合系数均随着入射脉冲能量的增大而增大, 且两组数据相差在6%以内, 在入射脉冲能量为3~14 J时, 冲量耦合系数最高可达260 N·MW-1。
Abstract
Air track method and impact pendulum method are two common measurement methods of impulse coupling coefficient. Relative errors were calculated and measurement experiments were carried out with the two methods, respectively. The results show that the relative error of air track method (4.6%) is smaller than that of impact pendulum method (6.1%), and measuring errors of the displacement data and the pendulum angle contribute the most to the system error. The experimental results of the two methods are basically identical: the two groups of coupling coefficients both increase with increasing incident pulse energy, and the difference between them remains no more than 6%. The impulse coupling coefficient can reach 260 N·MW-1 for incident pulse energy of 3 to 14 J.

陈静, 谭荣清, 郑义军, 吉洪煦, 文康, 徐程, 朱玉峰. 激光推进冲量耦合系数测量方法比较[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2011, 23(4): 871. Chen Jing, Tan Rongqing, Zheng Yijun, Ji Hongxu, Wen Kang, Xu Cheng, Zhu Yufeng. Comparison of measurement methods of impulse coupling coefficient for laser propulsion[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2011, 23(4): 871.

本文已被 2 篇论文引用
被引统计数据来源于中国光学期刊网
引用该论文: TXT   |   EndNote

相关论文

加载中...

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!