光学学报, 2014, 34 (5): 0530002, 网络出版: 2014-04-18   

采用铷原子射频频率调制光谱与调制转移光谱对1560 nm激光经波导倍频至780 nm进行稳频的比较

Laser Frequency Stabilization of 1560 nm Laser after Frequency Doubling to 780 nm with a Waveguide: Radio-Frequency Frequency-Modulation Spectroscopy versus Modulation Transfer Spectroscopy with Rb Atoms
作者单位
山西大学光电研究所量子光学与光量子器件国家重点实验室, 山西 太原 030006
摘要
采用射频频率调制光谱(RF-FMS)和调制转移光谱(MTS)将1560 nm分布反馈激光器经MgO:PPLN波导高效倍频后锁定于87Rb原子D2线超精细跃迁。比较了两种方法的原理、谱线以及锁频结果。激光器自由运转30 min的典型频率起伏为8~10 MHz,采用RF-FMS和MTS锁频30 min的频率起伏均方根分别为±135 kHz和±85 kHz,这主要是由于后者的信噪比高,谱线完全无背景。采用MTS方案,搭建了一套结构紧凑、性能稳定的1.5 μm光纤通信波段激光稳频系统。
Abstract
By efficient frequency doubling of 1560 nm distributed feed back laser with a MgO:PPLN waveguide, the laser frequency is locked to the D2 hyperfine transition of 87Rb atoms via radio-frequency frequency modulation spectroscopy (RF-FMS) and modulation transfer spectroscopy (MTS). The theories, spectra and frequency locking results of the two schemes are compared. The root mean squares of frequency fluctuation with feedback using the two schemes are ±135 kHz and ±85 kHz, respectively, while it is 8~10 MHz for free running. This is owing to the better signal-to-noise ratio and completely no background for MTS. Utilizing MTS, a compact, robust 1.5 μm laser system for fiber-optic communication application is built.

韩亚帅, 温馨, 白建东, 何军, 王军民. 采用铷原子射频频率调制光谱与调制转移光谱对1560 nm激光经波导倍频至780 nm进行稳频的比较[J]. 光学学报, 2014, 34(5): 0530002. Han Yashuai, Wen Xin, Bai Jiandong, He Jun, Wang Junmin. Laser Frequency Stabilization of 1560 nm Laser after Frequency Doubling to 780 nm with a Waveguide: Radio-Frequency Frequency-Modulation Spectroscopy versus Modulation Transfer Spectroscopy with Rb Atoms[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2014, 34(5): 0530002.

本文已被 8 篇论文引用
被引统计数据来源于中国光学期刊网
引用该论文: TXT   |   EndNote

相关论文

加载中...

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!