应用激光, 2015, 35 (1): 29, 网络出版: 2015-03-23  

同轴送粉和压片预置激光熔覆NiCoCrAlY涂层工艺比较

Process Comparison between Coaxial Powder Feeding and Squash Presenting Laser Cladding NiCoCrAlY Coatings
作者单位
1 南京航空航天大学机电学院, 江苏 南京 210016
2 铜陵学院机械工程系, 安徽 铜陵 244000
摘要
采用同轴送粉与压片预置激光熔覆工艺制备NiCoCrAlY涂层, 对两种激光熔覆工艺粉末利用率、涂层稀释率、熔覆层硬度及熔覆层微观组织形貌进行了比较。结果表明, 在涂层界面能形成良好冶金结合的优选工艺参数条件下, 同轴送粉激光熔覆粉末利用率和加工参数密切相关, 最高不超过0.4, 而压片预置激光熔覆粉末利用率高于0.9; 同轴送粉激光熔覆制备涂层熔合区为垂直于界面的柱状晶, 上部为均匀的等轴晶, 压片预置激光熔覆涂层的枝状晶贯穿整个涂层; 但是压片预制熔覆涂层的硬度略低于同轴送粉熔覆涂层。
Abstract
Coaxial powder feeding and squash presenting are used in laser cladding NiCoCrAlY coatings, powder utilization ratio, hardness, dilution ratio and the cladding layer coating microstructure morphology are compared. The results show that under the condition that the coatings form a good metallurgical bonding interface with preferred process parameters, the coaxial powder feeding laser cladding powder utilization ratio are no more than 0.4 and closely related to processing parameters, while the squash presenting laser cladding powder utilization ratio are greater than 0.9; there are columnar crystals perpendicular to the interface in Coaxial powder feeding laser cladding coating fusion zone, and the upper part are full with equiaxed crystals, as the dendrites throughout the coating formed by squash presenting laser cladding. And the hardness of squash presenting laser cladding coating is lower than coaxial powder feeding laser cladding coating slightly.

冯君, 田宗军, 王东生, 杨友文. 同轴送粉和压片预置激光熔覆NiCoCrAlY涂层工艺比较[J]. 应用激光, 2015, 35(1): 29. Feng Jun, Tian Zongjun, Wang Dongsheng, Yang Youwen. Process Comparison between Coaxial Powder Feeding and Squash Presenting Laser Cladding NiCoCrAlY Coatings[J]. APPLIED LASER, 2015, 35(1): 29.

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!