光通信研究, 2016 (6): 39, 网络出版: 2016-12-21  

光纤动态疲劳参数的两种测试方法及其差异分析 下载: 554次

Two Kinds of Test-Methods for Fiber Dynamic Fatigue Parameter and Their Difference Analysis
作者单位
1 武汉邮电科学研究院, 武汉 430074
2 烽火通信科技股份有限公司, 武汉 430074
摘要
由光纤筛选实验寿命预期模型可知, 影响光纤寿命的主要参数有威布尔指数m、应力腐蚀敏感性参数n和筛选应力与静态应力比值。文章重点讨论了轴向张力法和两点弯曲法对光纤寿命的重要评价指数动态疲劳参数Nd值的影响及判定。对两种测试方法测得的G.652D光纤的Nd值进行统计, 对优缺点进行了分析。结果表明, 轴向张力拉伸法可以很好地发现光纤强度问题, 但实现过程中光纤容易打滑, 而两点弯曲法则相反。在实际测试过程中应综合使用两种测试方法。
Abstract
Life expectancy by an optical fiber screening test model shows that the main parameters affecting the life of the optical fiber are Weibull exponent m, stress corrosion susceptibility parameter n and the ratio of screening stress and static stress. This paper mainly focuses on the effects and determination of axial tension method and two-point bending method to the value of Nd, which is a key parameter to evaluate the fiber life. The values of Nd under the two test methods for G.652D are statistically measured. The advantages and disadvantages of these two methods are also analyzed. Axial tension stretching method can find good fiber strength issue, but the implementation of optical fiber can be slippery. The bending method can well avoid fiber slippage problem, but it is difficult to find the strength of the optical fiber. Based on the above results, we suggest that both the test methods should be used in real application scenario.

于丽君, 胡鹏, 彭利红. 光纤动态疲劳参数的两种测试方法及其差异分析[J]. 光通信研究, 2016, 42(6): 39. YU Li-jun, HU Peng, PENG Li-hong. Two Kinds of Test-Methods for Fiber Dynamic Fatigue Parameter and Their Difference Analysis[J]. Study On Optical Communications, 2016, 42(6): 39.

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!