光谱学与光谱分析, 2015, 35 (7): 1774, 网络出版: 2015-09-08   

微脉冲激光雷达水平探测气溶胶两种反演算法对比与误差分析

Two Data Inversion Algorithms of Aerosol Horizontal Distribution Detected by MPL and Error Analysis
作者单位
中国科学院安徽光学精密机械研究所环境光学与技术重点实验室, 安徽 合肥 230031
摘要
大气气溶胶对人类健康、环境和气候系统具有重要的影响.微脉冲激光雷达(MPL)是一种新型的探测大气气溶胶水平分布的有效工具,而消光系数的反演和误差分析是其数据处理的重要内容.为了探测近地面大气气溶胶的水平分布情况,采用分段斜率法和Fernald算法对合肥地区实测MPL水平数据进行了消光系数反演,并将反演结果进行了对比和误差分析.误差分析表明,分段斜率法和Fernald算法的误差分别主要来源于其理论模型和多个假设条件.虽然分段斜率法和Fernald算法应用于大气水平消光系数的反演都仍存在一定的问题,精确度有待提高,但都能在一定程度上反映出气溶胶粒子的时空分布特征,与前向散射能见度仪的测量结果相关性都能达到95%以上,具有一定的可行性.且相对来说,Fernald法更适用于大气非均匀分布情况下消光系数的反演.
Abstract
Atmospheric aerosols have important impacts on human health,the environment and the climate system.Micro Pulse Lidar(MPL) is a new effective tool for detecting atmosphere aerosol horizontal distribution.And the extinction coefficient inversion and error analysis are important aspects of data processing.In order to detect the horizontal distribution of atmospheric aerosol near the ground,slope and Fernald algorithms were both used to invert horizontal MPL data and then the results were compared.The error analysis showed that the error of the slope algorithm and Fernald algorithm were mainly from theoretical model and some assumptions respectively.Though there still some problems exist in those two horizontal extinction coefficient inversions,they can present the spatial and temporal distribution of aerosol particles accurately,and the correlations with the forward-scattering visibility sensor are both high with the value of 95%.Furthermore relatively speaking,Fernald algorithm is more suitable for the inversion of horizontal extinction coefficient.
参考文献

[1] DONG Yun-sheng,LIU Wen-qing,LIU Jian-guo,et al(董云升,刘文清,刘建国,等).Optica Sinica(光学学报),2010,30(2):315.

[2] FAN Guang-qiang,LIU Jian-guo,ZHANG Tian-shu,et al(范广强,刘建国,张天舒,等).Chinese Journal of Lasers(中国激光),2011,38(s1):s114006.

[3] Kun Z G J,Leeuw G D E.Appl.Opt.,1993,32(18):3249.

[4] Fernald F G.Appl.Opt.,1984,23(5):652.

[5] DU Qi-cheng,JI Yu-feng,XU Chi-dong(杜其成,纪玉峰,徐赤东).Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics(大气与环境光学学报),2008,3(1):23.

[6] LIU Zeng-dong,LIU Jian-guo,LIU Wen-qing,et al(刘增东,刘建国,刘文清,等) .Infrared and Laser Engineering(红外与激光工程),2009,38(1):126.

[7] Sasano Y,Nakene H.Appl.Opt.,1984,23(1):11.

[8] TAO Zong-ming,WU De-cheng,LIU Dong,et al(陶宗明,吴德成,刘东,等).Chinese Journal of Lasers(中国激光),2011,38(12):1214001-1.

吕立慧, 刘文清, 张天舒, 陆亦怀, 董云升, 陈臻懿, 范广强, 亓少帅. 微脉冲激光雷达水平探测气溶胶两种反演算法对比与误差分析[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2015, 35(7): 1774. Lv Li-hui, LIU Wen-qing, ZHANG Tian-shu, LU Yi-huai, DONG Yun-sheng, CHEN Zhen-yi, FAN Guang-qiang, QI Shao-shuai. Two Data Inversion Algorithms of Aerosol Horizontal Distribution Detected by MPL and Error Analysis[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2015, 35(7): 1774.

本文已被 10 篇论文引用
被引统计数据来源于中国光学期刊网
引用该论文: TXT   |   EndNote

相关论文

加载中...

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!