光学学报, 2017, 37 (8): 0827001, 网络出版: 2018-09-07   

光子禁带中原子间距对三原子间纠缠演化特性的影响 下载: 872次

Effect of Interatomic Distance in Photonic Band Gap on Entanglement Evolution Property Among Three Atoms
闫丽 *
作者单位
菏泽学院物理与电子工程系, 山东 菏泽 274015
引用该论文

闫丽. 光子禁带中原子间距对三原子间纠缠演化特性的影响[J]. 光学学报, 2017, 37(8): 0827001.

Li Yan. Effect of Interatomic Distance in Photonic Band Gap on Entanglement Evolution Property Among Three Atoms[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2017, 37(8): 0827001.

参考文献

[1] Hou S C, Huang X L, Yi X X. Suppressing decoherence and improving entanglement by quantum-jump-based feedback control in two-level systems[J]. Physical Review A, 2010, 82(1): 012336.

    Hou S C, Huang X L, Yi X X. Suppressing decoherence and improving entanglement by quantum-jump-based feedback control in two-level systems[J]. Physical Review A, 2010, 82(1): 012336.

[2] Oliverira J G, Rossi R. Jr, Nemes M C. Protecting, enhancing, and reviving entanglement[J]. Physical Review A, 2008, 78(4): 044301.

    Oliverira J G, Rossi R. Jr, Nemes M C. Protecting, enhancing, and reviving entanglement[J]. Physical Review A, 2008, 78(4): 044301.

[3] Wang S C, Yu Z W, Zou W J, et al. Protecting quantum states from decoherence of finite temperature using weak measurement[J]. Physical Review A, 2014, 89(2): 022318.

    Wang S C, Yu Z W, Zou W J, et al. Protecting quantum states from decoherence of finite temperature using weak measurement[J]. Physical Review A, 2014, 89(2): 022318.

[4] Kim Y S, Lee J C, Kwon O, et al. Protecting entanglement from decoherence using weak measurement and quantum measurement reversal[J]. Nature Physics, 2012, 8(2): 117-120.

    Kim Y S, Lee J C, Kwon O, et al. Protecting entanglement from decoherence using weak measurement and quantum measurement reversal[J]. Nature Physics, 2012, 8(2): 117-120.

[5] Yu T, Eberly J H. Finite-time disentanglement via spontaneous emission[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2004, 93(14): 140404.

    Yu T, Eberly J H. Finite-time disentanglement via spontaneous emission[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2004, 93(14): 140404.

[6] Eberly J H, Yu T. The end of an entanglement[J]. Science, 2007, 316(5824): 555-557.

    Eberly J H, Yu T. The end of an entanglement[J]. Science, 2007, 316(5824): 555-557.

[7] Li Y, Zhou J, Guo H. Effect of the dipole-dipole interaction for two atoms with different couplings in a non-Markovian environment[J]. Physical Review A, 2009, 79(1): 012309.

    Li Y, Zhou J, Guo H. Effect of the dipole-dipole interaction for two atoms with different couplings in a non-Markovian environment[J]. Physical Review A, 2009, 79(1): 012309.

[8] Lehmberg R H. Radiation from an N-atom system. I. General formalism[J]. Physical Review A, 1970, 2(3): 883-888.

    Lehmberg R H. Radiation from an N-atom system. I. General formalism[J]. Physical Review A, 1970, 2(3): 883-888.

[9] Hu M L, Fan H. Robustness of quantum correlations against decoherence[J]. Annals of Physics, 2012, 327(3): 851-860.

    Hu M L, Fan H. Robustness of quantum correlations against decoherence[J]. Annals of Physics, 2012, 327(3): 851-860.

[10] 韩美, 张英杰, 夏云杰. 经典驱动Tavis-Cummings模型中原子纠缠特性的研究[J]. 光学学报, 2011, 31(4): 0427002.

    韩美, 张英杰, 夏云杰. 经典驱动Tavis-Cummings模型中原子纠缠特性的研究[J]. 光学学报, 2011, 31(4): 0427002.

    Han Mei, Zhang Yingjie, Xia Yunjie. Entanglement characteristics of two entangled atoms in classical driven Tavis-Cummings model[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2011, 31(4): 0427002.

    Han Mei, Zhang Yingjie, Xia Yunjie. Entanglement characteristics of two entangled atoms in classical driven Tavis-Cummings model[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2011, 31(4): 0427002.

[11] Tahira R, Ikrama M, Zubairy M S. Entanglement dynamics of spatially close bipartite atomic systems in thermal environment[J]. Optics Communications, 2011, 284(14): 3643-3648.

    Tahira R, Ikrama M, Zubairy M S. Entanglement dynamics of spatially close bipartite atomic systems in thermal environment[J]. Optics Communications, 2011, 284(14): 3643-3648.

[12] Man Z X, Zhang Y J, Su F, et al. Entanglement dynamics of multiqubit system in Markovian and non-Markovian reservoirs[J]. The European Physical Journal D, 2010, 58(1): 147-151.

    Man Z X, Zhang Y J, Su F, et al. Entanglement dynamics of multiqubit system in Markovian and non-Markovian reservoirs[J]. The European Physical Journal D, 2010, 58(1): 147-151.

[13] Barredo D, Ravets S, Labuhn H, et al. Demonstration of a strong Rydberg blockade in three-atom systems with anisotropic interactions[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2014, 112(18): 183002.

    Barredo D, Ravets S, Labuhn H, et al. Demonstration of a strong Rydberg blockade in three-atom systems with anisotropic interactions[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2014, 112(18): 183002.

[14] An N B, Kim J, Kim K. Entanglement dynamics of three interacting two-level atoms within a common structured environment[J]. Physical Review A, 2011, 84(2): 022329.

    An N B, Kim J, Kim K. Entanglement dynamics of three interacting two-level atoms within a common structured environment[J]. Physical Review A, 2011, 84(2): 022329.

[15] Lazarou C, Luoma K, Maniscalco S, et al. Entanglement trapping in a nonstationary structured reservoir[J]. Physical Review A, 2012, 86(1): 012331.

    Lazarou C, Luoma K, Maniscalco S, et al. Entanglement trapping in a nonstationary structured reservoir[J]. Physical Review A, 2012, 86(1): 012331.

[16] Zhang Y J, Han W, Fan H, et al. Enhancing entanglement trapping by weak measurement and quantum measurement reversal[J]. Annals of Physics, 2015, 354: 203-212.

    Zhang Y J, Han W, Fan H, et al. Enhancing entanglement trapping by weak measurement and quantum measurement reversal[J]. Annals of Physics, 2015, 354: 203-212.

[17] Wang J, Wu Y N, Mo M L, et al. Relationship between quantum speed limit time and memory time in a photonic-band-gap environment[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 39110.

    Wang J, Wu Y N, Mo M L, et al. Relationship between quantum speed limit time and memory time in a photonic-band-gap environment[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 39110.

[18] 韩伟, 崔文凯, 张英杰, 等. 不同环境模型下Bell型纠缠态衰退行为的比较[J]. 物理学报, 2012, 61(23): 230302.

    韩伟, 崔文凯, 张英杰, 等. 不同环境模型下Bell型纠缠态衰退行为的比较[J]. 物理学报, 2012, 61(23): 230302.

    Han Wei, Cui Wenkai, Zhang Yingjie, et al. Comparison of entanglement decay between Bell-like states under different environmental models[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(23): 230302.

    Han Wei, Cui Wenkai, Zhang Yingjie, et al. Comparison of entanglement decay between Bell-like states under different environmental models[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(23): 230302.

[19] Feng L J, Zhang Y J, Zhang L, et al. Entanglement dynamics of a three-qubit system with different interatomic distances[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2015, 24: 110305.

    Feng L J, Zhang Y J, Zhang L, et al. Entanglement dynamics of a three-qubit system with different interatomic distances[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2015, 24: 110305.

[20] Garraway B M. Decay of an atom coupled strongly to a reservoir[J]. Physical Review A, 1997, 55(6): 4636-4639.

    Garraway B M. Decay of an atom coupled strongly to a reservoir[J]. Physical Review A, 1997, 55(6): 4636-4639.

[21] Garraway B M. Nonperturbative decay of an atomic system in a cavity[J]. Physical Review A, 1997, 55(6): 2290-2303.

    Garraway B M. Nonperturbative decay of an atomic system in a cavity[J]. Physical Review A, 1997, 55(6): 2290-2303.

[22] Acin A, Audrianov A, Costa L. Generalized Schmidt decomposition and classification of three-quantum-bit states[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2000, 85(7): 071560.

    Acin A, Audrianov A, Costa L. Generalized Schmidt decomposition and classification of three-quantum-bit states[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2000, 85(7): 071560.

[23] Dur W, Vidal G. Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivatent ways[J]. Physical Review A, 2000, 62(6): 062314.

    Dur W, Vidal G. Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivatent ways[J]. Physical Review A, 2000, 62(6): 062314.

[24] Yamamoto T, Tamaki K. Polarization-entangled W state using parametric down-conversion[J]. Physical Review A, 2002, 66(6): 064301.

    Yamamoto T, Tamaki K. Polarization-entangled W state using parametric down-conversion[J]. Physical Review A, 2002, 66(6): 064301.

[25] Man Z X, Xia Y J, An N B. Entanglement dynamics for a six-qubit model in cavity QED[J]. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 2008, 41(15): 155501.

    Man Z X, Xia Y J, An N B. Entanglement dynamics for a six-qubit model in cavity QED[J]. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 2008, 41(15): 155501.

[26] Gorbacher V N, Rodichkina A A. On preparation of the entangled W-states form atomic ensembles[J]. Physics Letters A, 2003, 310: 339-343.

    Gorbacher V N, Rodichkina A A. On preparation of the entangled W-states form atomic ensembles[J]. Physics Letters A, 2003, 310: 339-343.

[27] Wang Y H, Song H S. Preparation of multi-atom specially entangled W-class state and splitting quantum information[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2009, 54(15): 2599-2650.

    Wang Y H, Song H S. Preparation of multi-atom specially entangled W-class state and splitting quantum information[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2009, 54(15): 2599-2650.

[28] Guo G C, Zhang Y S. Scheme for preparation of the W state via cavity quantum electrodynamics[J]. Physical Review A, 2002, 65(5): 054302.

    Guo G C, Zhang Y S. Scheme for preparation of the W state via cavity quantum electrodynamics[J]. Physical Review A, 2002, 65(5): 054302.

[29] Vidal G. Computable measure of entanglement[J]. Physical Review A, 2002, 65(3): 032314.

    Vidal G. Computable measure of entanglement[J]. Physical Review A, 2002, 65(3): 032314.

[30] Sabin C, Garcia-Alcaine G. A classification of entanglement in three-qubit systems[J]. The European Physical Journal D, 2008, 48(3): 435-442.

    Sabin C, Garcia-Alcaine G. A classification of entanglement in three-qubit systems[J]. The European Physical Journal D, 2008, 48(3): 435-442.

[32] Horodecki M, Horodecki P, Horodecki R. Mixed-state entanglement and distillation: Is there a “bound” entanglement in nature?[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1998, 80(24): 5239-5242.

    Horodecki M, Horodecki P, Horodecki R. Mixed-state entanglement and distillation: Is there a “bound” entanglement in nature?[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1998, 80(24): 5239-5242.

闫丽. 光子禁带中原子间距对三原子间纠缠演化特性的影响[J]. 光学学报, 2017, 37(8): 0827001. Li Yan. Effect of Interatomic Distance in Photonic Band Gap on Entanglement Evolution Property Among Three Atoms[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2017, 37(8): 0827001.

本文已被 3 篇论文引用
被引统计数据来源于中国光学期刊网
引用该论文: TXT   |   EndNote

相关论文

加载中...

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!