光学学报, 2003, 23 (2): 132, 网络出版: 2006-06-27   

两种连续变量爱因斯坦-波多尔斯基罗森关联测量方法的比较

Comparison between Two Methods Measuring of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Correlation for Continuous Variables
作者单位
山西大学光电研究所量子光学与光量子器件国家重点实验室,太原,030006
摘要
讨论了测量连续变量爱因斯坦波多尔斯基罗森(EPR)关联的两种实验方法。由于在平衡零拍探测和贝尔态直接测量中为标定关联度所选取的参考基准不同,造成谱仪显示的结果有所差异,但经过基准变换,所测得的耦合模压缩度、爱因斯坦波多尔斯基罗森关联度以及它们之间的换算关系均一致。从理论上分析了测量原理,并从实验角度讨论了两种方法的优缺点。
Abstract
The two methods measuring Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) correlation of continuous variables, the balanced homodyne detection and the direct measurement for Bell-state are analytically discussed. In the two detection systems the designated reference levels for the quantum correlation measurement are different, so the displayed results on the spectral analyzer are not identical. After implementing a transformation to the reference level the measured squeezing of coupled mode, EPR correlation and the relation expression between them are totally same. The measurement principle of the two methods is theoretically analyzed and their characteristics are discussed from the requirements of experiments.

荆杰泰, 李小英, 潘庆. 两种连续变量爱因斯坦-波多尔斯基罗森关联测量方法的比较[J]. 光学学报, 2003, 23(2): 132. 荆杰泰, 李小英, 潘庆. Comparison between Two Methods Measuring of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Correlation for Continuous Variables[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2003, 23(2): 132.

本文已被 3 篇论文引用
被引统计数据来源于中国光学期刊网
引用该论文: TXT   |   EndNote

相关论文

加载中...

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!