激光技术, 2008, 32 (3): 0323, 网络出版: 2010-06-03   

相位展开的6种算法比较

Comparison of six phase unwrapping algorithms
作者单位
1 九江学院 理学院,九江 332005
2 华南师范大学 信息光电子科技学院,广州 510631
摘要
相位展开算法主要可以分为路径跟踪算法和全局展开算法。为了比较这些算法的性能,采用计算机模拟斜面和高斯面,并加入不同程度噪声产生包裹相位;从两大类中各选取3种比较典型的算法分别对其进行相位展开,计算它们的均方根误差;最后对实验数据进行比较和理论分析。结果表明,基于网络规划的最小费用流算法和基于贝叶斯推断的ZπM算法是较为有效的算法,在实际应用中值得选择和改进。
Abstract
Various phase unwrapping algorithms have been proposed for the last two decades. They mainly can be grouped into two classes: Path-following and global phase unwrapping algorithms. In order to compare their performances,firstly,different type wrap phases were generated according to computer-simulating inclined and Gaussian planes at various noise levels. Then three representative algorithms were chosen from the two classes respectively and their unwrapping phases and root-mean-square errors were calculated. Lastly,experimental data were compared and analyzed theoretically. The results show that minimum cost flow algorithm based on network programming and ZπM algorithm based on Bayesian reference are more robust,effective,and prior to be chosen or improved in practical application.

杨锋涛, 罗江龙, 刘志强, 吕晓旭. 相位展开的6种算法比较[J]. 激光技术, 2008, 32(3): 0323. YANG Feng-tao, LUO Jiang-long, LIU Zhi-qiang, Lü Xiao-xu. Comparison of six phase unwrapping algorithms[J]. Laser Technology, 2008, 32(3): 0323.

本文已被 6 篇论文引用
被引统计数据来源于中国光学期刊网
引用该论文: TXT   |   EndNote

相关论文

加载中...

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!