激光与光电子学进展, 2019, 56 (3): 031009, 网络出版: 2019-07-31   

四元数谱余量彩色图像质量评价 下载: 985次

Color Image Quality Assessment Based on Quaternion Spectral Residual
作者单位
宁夏大学数学统计学院, 宁夏 银川 750021
图 & 表

图 1. RGB图像转换为纯四元数矩阵示意图

Fig. 1. Schematic of color imageconvert to a pure quaternion matrix

下载图片 查看原文

图 2. 彩色图像的四元数梯度图。(a)彩色图像;(b)与(a)相对应的四元数梯度图; (c)彩色图像; (d)与(c)相对应的四元数梯度图

Fig. 2. Quaternion gradient maps of color images. (a) Color images; (b) corresponding quaternion gradient maps of (a); (c) color images; (d) corresponding quaternion gradient maps of (c)

下载图片 查看原文

图 3. QSR-SIM质量评价算法的流程图

Fig. 3. Flowchart of QSR-SIM algorithm

下载图片 查看原文

图 4. TID2013数据库上不同图像质量评价算法的回归曲线。 (a) SSIM;(b) FISM;(c) MS-GMSDc;(d) QSSIM;(e) SR-SIM;(f) QSR-SIM

Fig. 4. Regression curves of different image quality evaluation algorithms in TID2013. (a) SSIM; (b) FISM; (c) MS-GMSDc; (d) QSSIM; (e) SR-SIM; (f) QSR-SIM

下载图片 查看原文

图 5. 参考图像及其不同类型的失真图像。(a)参考图像I07;(b) I07_11_5;(c) I07_12_4;(d) I07_15_3;(e) I07_17_4;(f) I07_24_5

Fig. 5. Reference image and its distortion images of different types. (a) Reference image I07; (b) I07_11_5; (c) I07_12_4; (d) I07_15_3; (e) I07_17_4; (f) I07_24_5

下载图片 查看原文

表 1参考图像I07的5种失真图像在不同评价算法实验中的结果

Table1. Results of five kinds of distorted pictures of reference image I07 in different evaluation algorithm experiments

AlgorithmI07_11_5I07_12_4I07_15_3I07_17_4I07_24_5
Subjective score0.97732.86363.04556.72730.4762
QSR-SIM0.97010.99190.99680.99760.9691
VSI[4]0.89640.96100.96140.98680.8875
SR-SIM[3]0.82830.93170.96360.98030.8056
FSIM[5]0.72030.91500.96100.96210.7137
SSIM[21]0.59220.72080.96830.95160.6019
VSNR[23]8.756115.023712.22311.32398.6929
PSNR[24]23.000726.174327.201425.083623.0449
GMSD[25]0.24180.12150.12910.02590.2622

查看原文

表 2不同评价算法的排名

Table2. Ranking of different evaluation algorithms

AlgorithmI07_11_5I07_12_4I07_15_3I07_17_4I07_24_5
Subjective score43215
QSR-SIM43215
VSI43215
SR-SIM43215
FSIM43215
SSIM53124
VSNR41235
PSNR52134
GMSD42315

查看原文

表 3算法的时间复杂度比较

Table3. Comparison of time complexity of algorithms

DatabaseTime /s
QSSIMQSR-SIM
I17_11_21.11240.7474
TID2013520485

查看原文

表 4各彩色图像质量评价方法的性能比较

Table4. Comparison of various color image quality assessment methods' performance

DatabaseParameterPSNRSSIMFSIMGMSDMS-GMSDSR-SIMQSR-SIM
TID2013SROCC0.68690.74170.80150.80300.81390.80730.8169
KROCC0.49580.55880.62890.63520.64670.64040.6268
PLCC0.67480.78950.85890.85750.86180.79700.8413
RMSE0.91490.76080.63490.47620.62880.61930.6701
CSIQSROCC0.80580.87560.92420.95150.95450.93190.9435
KROCC0.60840.69070.75670.80210.80750.77250.7821
PLCC0.80000.86130.91200.94530.95120.92500.8049
RMSE0.15750.13340.10770.08560.08100.09970.1618

查看原文

表 5各评价算法的在TID2013数据库中不同失真类型下的SROCC值

Table5. SROCC values for different distortion types for various evaluation algorithms in the TID2013 database

DatabaseDistortiontypeMS-SSIM[26]SSIM_I[27]SSIMIFC[28]VSNRIW-SSIMFSIMSR-SIMVSIQSR-SIM
TID2013AGN0.86460.86270.86710.66120.82710.84380.89730.92530.94600.9138
ANC0.77300.77630.77260.53520.73050.75150.82080.85700.87050.8111
SCN0.85440.85050.85150.66010.80130.81670.87500.92250.93670.8900
MN0.80730.78950.77670.69320.70720.80200.79440.78600.76970.7036
HFN0.86040.86880.86340.74060.84550.85530.89840.91320.92000.9042
IN0.76290.78960.75030.64080.73630.72810.80720.82770.87410.7885
QN0.87060.84110.86570.62820.83570.84680.87190.85020.87480.8626
GB0.96730.97240.96680.89070.94700.97010.95510.96200.96120.9118
DEN0.92680.92960.92540.77790.90810.91520.93020.94030.94840.9366
JPEG0.92650.92270.92000.83570.90080.91870.93240.93860.95410.9219
JP2K0.95040.95750.94680.90780.92730.95060.95770.96740.97060.9522
JGTE0.84750.85810.84930.74250.79080.83880.84640.85430.92160.7764
J2TE0.88890.88560.88280.77690.84070.86560.89130.91660.92280.8355
NEPN0.79680.78850.78210.57370.66530.80110.79170.79750.80600.8141
Block0.48010.45630.57200.24140.17710.37170.54890.47310.17130.5545
MS0.79060.78450.77520.55220.48710.78330.75310.65760.77000.7762
CTC0.46340.38000.37750.17980.33200.45930.46860.47050.47540.4671
CCS0.40990.42080.41410.40290.36770.41960.27480.20530.81000.5359
MGN0.77860.80920.78030.61430.76440.77280.84690.87780.91170.8110
CN0.85280.87110.85660.81600.86830.87620.91210.92630.92430.9084
LCNI0.90680.91730.90570.81800.88210.90370.94660.96080.95640.9406
ICQD0.85550.83510.85420.60060.86670.84010.87600.88030.88390.8795
CHA0.87840.87710.87750.82100.86450.86820.87150.87540.89060.8494
SSR0.94830.94880.94610.88850.93390.94740.95650.96140.96280.9625

查看原文

岳靖, 刘国军, 付浩. 四元数谱余量彩色图像质量评价[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 2019, 56(3): 031009. Jing Yue, Guojun Liu, Hao Fu. Color Image Quality Assessment Based on Quaternion Spectral Residual[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(3): 031009.

本文已被 2 篇论文引用
被引统计数据来源于中国光学期刊网
引用该论文: TXT   |   EndNote

相关论文

加载中...

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!