Experimental demonstration of an electrically tunable broadband coherent perfect absorber based on a graphene–electrolyte–graphene sandwich structure

Jin Zhang; Xingzhan Wei; Malin Premaratne; Weiren Zhu

doi:doi:10.1364/PRJ.7.000868

Photonics Research, 2019, 7 (8): 08000868, Published Online: Jul. 17, 2019

Experimental demonstration of an electrically tunable broadband coherent perfect absorber based on a graphene–electrolyte–graphene sandwich structure Download： 511次

Jin Zhang ¹Xingzhan Wei ²Malin Premaratne ³Weiren Zhu ^1,*

Author Affiliations

¹ Department of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

² Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 400714, China

³ Advanced Computing and Simulation Laboratory (AχL), Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic view of a GSS illustrated by two counter-propagating and coherently modulated input beams (I+ and I−), with O+ and O− being the output beams. (b) Equivalent circuit model of the GSS.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 2. Coherent absorption of GSS for plane wave versus frequency under different Fermi levels. The solid line represents the 3D full wave simulation results and dotted line means the equivalent circuit calculated results.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 3. Two-dimensional false-color plot of the calculated coherent absorption as a function of Fermi level and phase modulation. (a) Equivalent circuit calculated results and (b) simulated results.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 4. (a) and (b) Calculated coherent absorption under TE/TM incident illumination, where the dashed lines denote the condition of EF=0.22 eV. (c) CPA Fermi-level dispersion at an oblique incidence for TE polarization (red solid curve) and TM polarization (blue solid curve).

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 5. Coherent absorption of N-layers stacked GSS versus Fermi energy. Insert graph is the schematic of stacked GSS illuminated by two counter-propagating input beams. Solid curves represent the equivalent circuit calculated results and triangles refer to the full-wave simulation results.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 6. (a) Optical image of graphene on a PVC substrate. (b) Raman spectrum of monolayer graphene. (c) Fabricated GSS device. (d) Configuration of the waveguide measurement setup. (e) Relation between the Fermi level of graphene and bias voltage.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 7. (a) Measured (circles) and calculated (solid lines) coherent absorptivities of GSS in the waveguide system under different bias voltages. (b) A 2D false-color plot of the coherent absorptivity as a function of frequency and phase modulation (U=3 V). (c) Coherent absorption of single- or multilayered GSS versus bias voltage (f=4.27 GHz).

下载图片查看原文

Jin Zhang, Xingzhan Wei, Malin Premaratne, Weiren Zhu. Experimental demonstration of an electrically tunable broadband coherent perfect absorber based on a graphene–electrolyte–graphene sandwich structure[J]. Photonics Research, 2019, 7(8): 08000868.

Experimental demonstration of an electrically tunable broadband coherent perfect absorber based on a graphene–electrolyte–graphene sandwich structure Download： 511次

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic view of a GSS illustrated by two counter-propagating and coherently modulated input beams (I+ and I−), with O+ and O− being the output beams. (b) Equivalent circuit model of the GSS.

Fig. 2. Coherent absorption of GSS for plane wave versus frequency under different Fermi levels. The solid line represents the 3D full wave simulation results and dotted line means the equivalent circuit calculated results.

Fig. 3. Two-dimensional false-color plot of the calculated coherent absorption as a function of Fermi level and phase modulation. (a) Equivalent circuit calculated results and (b) simulated results.

Fig. 4. (a) and (b) Calculated coherent absorption under TE/TM incident illumination, where the dashed lines denote the condition of EF=0.22 eV. (c) CPA Fermi-level dispersion at an oblique incidence for TE polarization (red solid curve) and TM polarization (blue solid curve).

Fig. 5. Coherent absorption of N-layers stacked GSS versus Fermi energy. Insert graph is the schematic of stacked GSS illuminated by two counter-propagating input beams. Solid curves represent the equivalent circuit calculated results and triangles refer to the full-wave simulation results.

Fig. 6. (a) Optical image of graphene on a PVC substrate. (b) Raman spectrum of monolayer graphene. (c) Fabricated GSS device. (d) Configuration of the waveguide measurement setup. (e) Relation between the Fermi level of graphene and bias voltage.

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

全站搜索

Experimental demonstration of an electrically tunable broadband coherent perfect absorber based on a graphene–electrolyte–graphene sandwich structure Download： 511次

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic view of a GSS illustrated by two counter-propagating and coherently modulated input beams (I+ and I−), with O+ and O− being the output beams. (b) Equivalent circuit model of the GSS.

Fig. 2. Coherent absorption of GSS for plane wave versus frequency under different Fermi levels. The solid line represents the 3D full wave simulation results and dotted line means the equivalent circuit calculated results.

Fig. 3. Two-dimensional false-color plot of the calculated coherent absorption as a function of Fermi level and phase modulation. (a) Equivalent circuit calculated results and (b) simulated results.

Fig. 4. (a) and (b) Calculated coherent absorption under TE/TM incident illumination, where the dashed lines denote the condition of EF=0.22 eV. (c) CPA Fermi-level dispersion at an oblique incidence for TE polarization (red solid curve) and TM polarization (blue solid curve).

Fig. 5. Coherent absorption of N-layers stacked GSS versus Fermi energy. Insert graph is the schematic of stacked GSS illuminated by two counter-propagating input beams. Solid curves represent the equivalent circuit calculated results and triangles refer to the full-wave simulation results.

Fig. 6. (a) Optical image of graphene on a PVC substrate. (b) Raman spectrum of monolayer graphene. (c) Fabricated GSS device. (d) Configuration of the waveguide measurement setup. (e) Relation between the Fermi level of graphene and bias voltage.

相关论文

相关资讯

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

全站搜索