基于光谱数据融合技术的手帕纸品牌分类

季佳华; 王继芬; 何欣龙

doi:doi:10.3788/LOP202158.0330004

激光与光电子学进展, 2021, 58 (3): 0330004, 网络出版: 2021-03-12

基于光谱数据融合技术的手帕纸品牌分类

Classification of Handkerchief Paper Brand Based on Spectral Data Fusion Technology

季佳华王继芬 ^*何欣龙

作者单位

中国人民公安大学侦查学院，北京 100038

图 & 表

图 1. 手帕纸样本的红外光谱

Fig. 1. Infrared spectra of handkerchief paper samples

下载图片查看原文

图 2. 手帕纸样本的拉曼光谱

Fig. 2. Raman spectra of handkerchief paper samples

下载图片查看原文

图 3. 8个品牌手帕纸在不同维度下分类准确率的变化趋势图

Fig. 3. Trend chart of classification accuracy of 8 brands of handkerchief paper in different dimensions

下载图片查看原文

图 4. 14个系列心相印手帕纸在不同维度下的分类准确率

Fig. 4. Classification accuracy of 14 series of Xinxiangyin handkerchiefs in different dimensions

下载图片查看原文

表 1两种光谱线性判别分析的准确率、召回率和假正率

Table1. LDA accuracy, recall rate and false positive rate of two spectra

Brand	Infrared spectrum			Raman spectrum
Brand	Accuracy/%	Recall/%	False positive/%	Accuracy/%	Recall/%	False positive/%
QF	92.1	66.7	5.3	96.8	66.7	0
SJ	85.7	66.7	11.1	98.4	88.9	0
WD	92.1	66.7	2.0	88.9	66.7	5.9
XBB	92.1	55.6	1.9	93.7	77.8	3.7
XS	90.5	83.3	8.8	93.7	83.3	5.3
XXY	92.1	77.8	5.6	90.5	77.8	7.4
XZL	93.7	66.7	3.5	98.4	83.3	0.0
YR	92.1	33.3	1.8	98.4	100	1.8

查看原文

表 2光谱融合后线性判别分析的准确率、召回率和假正率

Table2. LDA accuracy, recall rate and false positive rate after spectral fusion

Brand	Accuracy/%	Recall/%	False positive/%
QF	98.4	83.3	0
SJ	98.4	88.9	0
WD	92.1	75.0	3.9
XBB	95.2	88.9	3.7
XS	95.2	83.3	3.5
XXY	93.7	88.9	5.6
XZL	98.4	83.3	0
YR	96.8	83.3	1.8

查看原文

表 3主成分分析的特征方差贡献率

Table3. Characteristic variance contribution rate of PCA

Component	Eigenvalue	Variance/%	Cumulative variance/%	Component	Eigenvalue	Variance/%	Cumulative variance/%
PC1	437.789	48.162	48.162	PC20	2.176	0.239	96.066
PC2	231.312	25.447	73.608	PC21	2.096	0.231	96.297
PC3	90.879	9.998	83.606	PC22	2.023	0.223	96.520
PC4	26.028	2.863	86.470	PC23	1.918	0.211	96.731
PC5	21.176	2.330	88.799	PC24	1.786	0.196	96.927
PC6	11.269	1.240	90.039	PC25	1.702	0.187	97.114
PC7	8.257	0.908	90.947	PC26	1.587	0.175	97.289
PC8	6.497	0.715	91.662	PC27	1.481	0.163	97.452
PC9	5.023	0.553	92.215	PC28	1.425	0.157	97.609
PC10	4.111	0.452	92.667	PC29	1.382	0.152	97.761
PC11	4.000	0.440	93.107	PC30	1.289	0.142	97.902
PC12	3.757	0.413	93.520	PC31	1.252	0.138	98.040
PC13	3.719	0.409	93.929	PC32	1.183	0.130	98.170
PC14	3.475	0.382	94.311	PC33	1.154	0.127	98.297
PC15	3.178	0.350	94.661	PC34	1.089	0.12	98.417
PC16	3.035	0.334	94.995	PC35	1.024	0.113	98.530
PC17	2.756	0.303	95.298	PC36	0.952	0.105	98.634
PC18	2.507	0.276	95.574	PC37	0.914	0.101	98.735
PC19	2.300	0.253	95.827

查看原文

表 4线性判别分析在不同维度下的准确率

Table4. Accuracy of LDA in different dimensions

Dimension	Precision/%								Overall accuracy/%
Dimension	QF	SJ	WD	XS	XBB	XXY	XZL	YR	Overall accuracy/%
2	50.0	11.1	0	55.6	33.3	11.1	66.7	0	25.4
3	83.3	55.6	8.3	44.4	66.7	33.3	66.7	16.7	42.9
4	83.3	66.7	16.7	44.4	66.7	33.3	66.7	16.7	46.0
5	83.3	44.4	33.3	55.6	66.7	44.4	66.7	16.7	49.2
6	83.3	33.3	25.0	55.6	66.7	55.6	83.3	33.3	50.8
7	83.3	33.3	50.0	66.7	66.7	66.7	83.3	33.3	58.7
8	83.3	44.4	50.0	77.8	66.7	66.7	83.3	33.3	61.9
9	83.3	44.4	58.3	77.8	66.7	66.7	83.3	33.3	63.5
10	83.3	55.6	58.3	77.8	83.3	66.7	83.3	50.0	68.3
11	100	66.7	58.3	77.8	100	66.7	66.7	66.7	73.0
12	100	44.4	50.0	66.7	100	77.8	66.7	66.7	68.3
13	100	44.4	66.7	66.7	100	100	66.7	83.3	76.2
14	83.3	66.7	66.7	77.8	83.3	100	66.7	66.7	76.2
15	83.3	66.7	75.0	77.8	83.3	100	66.7	66.7	77.8
16	83.3	77.8	66.7	88.9	83.3	88.9	66.7	50.0	76.2
17	100	88.9	66.7	88.9	83.3	88.9	66.7	83.3	82.5
18	100	100	83.3	88.9	100	100	100	83.3	93.7
19	100	100	91.7	88.9	100	88.9	83.3	100	93.7
20	100	100	83.3	77.8	100	88.9	100	100	92.1
21	100	100	83.3	88.9	100	88.9	83.3	100	92.1
22	100	100	83.3	88.9	100	100	100	100	95.2
23	100	88.9	83.3	88.9	100	100	100	100	93.7
24	100	100	75.0	88.9	100	100	100	100	93.7
25	100	100	83.3	88.9	100	100	100	100	95.2
26	100	100	91.7	88.9	100	100	100	100	96.8
27	100	100	91.7	88.9	100	100	100	100	96.8
28	100	100	91.7	88.9	100	100	100	100	96.8
29	100	100	91.7	88.9	100	100	100	100	96.8
30	100	100	91.7	88.9	100	100	100	100	96.8
31	100	100	100	88.9	100	100	100	100	98.4
32	100	100	100	88.9	100	100	100	100	98.4
33	100	100	100	88.9	100	100	100	100	98.4
34	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100

查看原文

表 5检材与样本的比对结果

Table5. Comparison results of material and sample

Material	QF	SJ	WD	XS	XBB	XXY	XZL	YR
JC1						√
JC2			√

查看原文

季佳华, 王继芬, 何欣龙. 基于光谱数据融合技术的手帕纸品牌分类[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 2021, 58(3): 0330004. Ji Jiahua, Wang Jifen, He Xinlong. Classification of Handkerchief Paper Brand Based on Spectral Data Fusion Technology[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(3): 0330004.

基于光谱数据融合技术的手帕纸品牌分类

图 1. 手帕纸样本的红外光谱

Fig. 1. Infrared spectra of handkerchief paper samples

图 2. 手帕纸样本的拉曼光谱

Fig. 2. Raman spectra of handkerchief paper samples

图 3. 8个品牌手帕纸在不同维度下分类准确率的变化趋势图

Fig. 3. Trend chart of classification accuracy of 8 brands of handkerchief paper in different dimensions

图 4. 14个系列心相印手帕纸在不同维度下的分类准确率

Fig. 4. Classification accuracy of 14 series of Xinxiangyin handkerchiefs in different dimensions

表 1两种光谱线性判别分析的准确率、召回率和假正率

Table1. LDA accuracy, recall rate and false positive rate of two spectra

表 2光谱融合后线性判别分析的准确率、召回率和假正率

Table2. LDA accuracy, recall rate and false positive rate after spectral fusion

表 3主成分分析的特征方差贡献率

Table3. Characteristic variance contribution rate of PCA

表 4线性判别分析在不同维度下的准确率

Table4. Accuracy of LDA in different dimensions

表 5检材与样本的比对结果

Table5. Comparison results of material and sample

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

全站搜索

基于光谱数据融合技术的手帕纸品牌分类

图 1. 手帕纸样本的红外光谱

Fig. 1. Infrared spectra of handkerchief paper samples

图 2. 手帕纸样本的拉曼光谱

Fig. 2. Raman spectra of handkerchief paper samples

图 3. 8个品牌手帕纸在不同维度下分类准确率的变化趋势图

Fig. 3. Trend chart of classification accuracy of 8 brands of handkerchief paper in different dimensions

图 4. 14个系列心相印手帕纸在不同维度下的分类准确率

Fig. 4. Classification accuracy of 14 series of Xinxiangyin handkerchiefs in different dimensions

表 1两种光谱线性判别分析的准确率、召回率和假正率

Table1. LDA accuracy, recall rate and false positive rate of two spectra

表 2光谱融合后线性判别分析的准确率、召回率和假正率

Table2. LDA accuracy, recall rate and false positive rate after spectral fusion

表 3主成分分析的特征方差贡献率

Table3. Characteristic variance contribution rate of PCA

表 4线性判别分析在不同维度下的准确率

Table4. Accuracy of LDA in different dimensions

表 5检材与样本的比对结果

Table5. Comparison results of material and sample

相关论文

相关资讯

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

全站搜索