强激光与粒子束, 2017, 29 (10): 103205, 网络出版: 2017-10-30  

传输线长度对静电放电防护器件性能测试的影响

Effect of length of transmission line on performance test of electrostatic discharge protection device
作者单位
1 陆军工程大学石家庄校区 静电与电磁防护研究所, 石家庄 050003
2 武汉理工大学 信息学院, 武汉 430063
摘要
为了研究传输线长度对静电放电防护器件性能测试结果的影响,建立了静电放电模型和传输线脉冲模型两种试验系统,对某限压型防护器件进行了快沿电磁脉冲注入试验,并进行了理论分析。结果表明:传输线长度对静电放电防护器件性能测试结果具有极大影响,选用不当会导致错误结论;在对静电放电防护器件性能测试时,应优先采用传输线脉冲测试法;当采用静电放电脉冲测试法时,其传输线长度不应小于8 m。
Abstract
To study the transient response of electrostatic discharge(ESD) protection device to the EMP with fast rise time, human-metal model (HMM) and transmission line pulse (TLP) current waveforms are widely used for ESD protection devices testing. In this paper, two testing systems were developed. One is an HMM tester, basing on IEC61000-4-2. The other can generate TLP waveform by transmission line charging and discharging. A type of ESD protection device was tested. Transient response waveforms, clamping voltage, clamping time, overshoot voltage were obtained, and the influence of transmission line length on the test results was studied and analyzed theoretically. The experiment results show that: The length of TL has a great impact on the performance testing of an ESD protection device, improper selection can lead to a wrong conclusion; When the ESD protection device is under test, TLP testing is preferred; The length of TL should be less than 8 meters when the ESD pulse testing is used.
参考文献

[1] 刘尚合, 武占成, 朱长青, 等. 静电放电及危害防护[M]. 北京: 北京邮电大学出版社, 2004: 83-86, 182-188. (Liu Shanghe, Wu Zhancheng, Zhu Changqing, et al. ESD hazard and protection. Beijing: Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications Press, 2004: 83-86, 182-188)

[2] 刘尚合, 武占成, 张希军. 电磁环境效应及其发展趋势[J]. 国防科技, 2008, 29(1): 1-6. (Liu Shanghe, Wu Zhancheng, Zhang Xijun. Electromagnetic environment effect and its development. National Defense Science and Technology, 2008, 29(1): 1-6)

[3] IEC 61000-4-2-2008, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), Part 4-2. Testing and measurement techniques—Electrostatic discharges immunity Test[S].

[4] Beges R, Caignet F, Besse P, et al. TLP-based human metal model stress generator and analysis method of ESD generators[C]//EOS/ESD Symposium, 2015: 1-10.

[5] Scholz M, Chen S, H, Johansson D, et al. Miscorrelation between IEC61000-4-2 type of HMM tester and 50 Ω HMM tester[C]//EOS/ESD Symposium, 2012: 1-9.

[6] ANSI/ESD STM5.5.1-2014, ESD association standard test method for electrostatic discharge (ESD) sensitivity testing—Transmission Line Pulse (TLP)-component level[S].

[7] 张希军, 杨洁, 张庆海. 瞬态电压抑制器在快上升沿电磁脉冲作用下的瞬态响应[J]. 高电压技术, 2012, 38(9): 2242-2247. (Zhang Xijun, Yang Jie, Zhang Qinghai. Transient response of transient voltage suppressor device under EMP with fast rise time. High Voltage Engineering, 2012, 38(9): 2242-2247)

[8] 梁振光, 杨明远. 传输线脉冲发生器研制及其对电路板抗静电放电干扰的测试[J]. 高电压技术, 2015, 41(5): 1610-1617. (Liang Zhenguang, Yang Mingyuan. Development of transmission line pulse and its immunity test for electrostatic discharge on printed circuit board. High Voltage Engineering, 2015, 41(5): 1610-1617)

[9] 刘进, 陈永光, 谭志良, 等. 静电放电电磁场的特性及分布规律[J]. 高电压技术, 2012, 38(2): 435-443. (Liu Jin, Chen Yongguang, Tan Zhiliang, et al. Characteristics and distribution of electromagnetic field caused by electrostatic discharge. High Voltage Engineering, 2012, 38(2): 435-443)

[10] 刘卫东, 刘尚合, 胡小锋, 等. 静电放电近区辐射电场的时域测试与实验分析[J]. 高电压技术, 2012, 38(9): 2259-2265. (Liu Weidong, Liu Shanghe, Hu Xiaofeng, et al. Time domain measurement and experiment analysis of near electric field radiated from electrostatic discharge. High Voltage Engineering, 2012, 38(9): 2259-2265.

[11] 张希军, 杨洁, 王振兴, 等. 微带线在快速电磁脉冲防护器件性能测试中的应用[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2011, 28(3): 21-23. (Zhang Xijun, Yang Jie, Wang Zhenxing, et al. The application of microstrip transmission line in performance test on EMP protection device. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2011, 28(3): 21-23)

[12] Zhang Xijun, Yang Jie, Yuan Qingyun, et al. Research on the suppressing behaviour of EMP protection device[C]//Cross Strait Quad-regional Radio Science and Wireless Technology Conference. 2011: 318-321.

[13] GJB 911-90, 电磁脉冲防护器件测试方法[S]. (GJB 911-90, Measuring methods for EMP protection devices)

张希军, 张莉婷, 王书平, 赵敏. 传输线长度对静电放电防护器件性能测试的影响[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2017, 29(10): 103205. Zhang Xijun, Zhang Liting, Wang Shuping, Zhao Min. Effect of length of transmission line on performance test of electrostatic discharge protection device[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29(10): 103205.

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!