LIF技术与PLS-DA算法联合辨识矿井涌水水源类型的研究

快速的矿井涌水水源辨识对于矿井的水灾预警及灾后救援意义重大。常规方法使用离子浓度做为判别因子, 耗时过长, 因此提出一种激光诱导荧光光谱(LIF)技术与偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)算法联合快速辨识矿井涌水水源类型的方法。实验使用405 nm激光对被测水体进行激发, 获取矿井5个不同含水层100组水样的荧光光谱, 根据光谱曲线特征, 对数据进行压缩处理, 获取合适的光谱数据。每种水样使用15组共75组光谱数据作为建模集, 剩余的25组水样的光谱数据作为测试集。为验证实验结果, 设计了簇类的独立软模式(SIMCA)算法与PLS-DA算法构建的实验模型进行对比。实验发现矿井不同含水层水样的荧光光谱差异较大, 在不进行任何预处理的情况下, 以PLS模型为基础的PLS-DA算法较SIMCA算法的建模正确率高, 达到了100%, 其校正及验证结果与实际分类变量的相关系数均大于0.951, 校正集均方根误差(RMSECV)和验证集均方根误差(RMSEP)均小于0.123, 利用模型对测试集中五种水样样本的识别正确率均为100%。

Abstract

Rapid source identification of mine water inrush has great significance for early warning and rescuing after the mine water inrush. Conventional method taking the concentration of ions as the discriminant factor takes such a long time that a method of rapid source identification of mine water inrush is in urgent need. This method is combined with Laser induced fluorescence (LIF) technology and Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) algorithm. In the experiment, 405 nm laser was used to excite the water and 100 groups of fluorescence spectrum from 5 different aquifer of the mine were obtained. According to the spectra curve features, the data was compressed to obtain proper spectral data. 15 groups of spectrum of each water inrush samples were applied, with a total of 75 groups of spectrum as the prediction set while the rest of 25 groups of spectrum as the test set. To verify the experimental result, an experimental model was built with soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) to compare with PLS-DA. The result shows that the fluorescence spectra of different aquifer water samples is of great difference, without any pre-treatment, the PLS-DA algorithm based on the PLS model has higher modeling accuracy compared with SIMCA algorithm, which reaches to 100%, the validation results and the correlation of separation of variables are both more than 0.951, the RMSECV and RMSEP are both less than 0.123, using the model to identify the 5 water samples of test set, the accuracy are up to 100%.

参考文献

[1] LU Jin-tao, LI Xi-bing, GONG Feng-qiang(鲁金涛, 李夕兵, 宫凤强). China Safety Science Journal(中国安全科学学报), 2012, 22(7): 109.

[2] GONG Feng-qiang, LU Jin-tao(宫凤强, 鲁金涛). Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering(采矿与安全工程学报), 2014, 31(2): 236.

[3] WANG Xin-yi, XU Tao, HUANG Dan(王心义, 徐涛, 黄丹). Journal of China Coal Society(煤炭学报), 2011, 36, (8): 1334.

[4] HU Wei-yue, YIN Shang-xian(虎维岳, 尹尚先). Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering(岩石力学与工程学报), 2010, 29, (1): 3344.

[5] ZHAO Su-qi, WU Qiang, YIN Shang-xian(赵苏启, 武强, 尹尚先). Journal of China Coal Society(煤炭学报), 2006, 31(1): 618.

[6] WANG Chang-shen, SUN Ya-jun, HANG Yuan(王长申, 孙亚军, 杭远). Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering(岩石力学与工程学报), 2009, 28(2): 298.

[7] YANG Yong-guo, HUANG Fu-chen(杨永国, 黄福臣). Journal of China University of Mining and Technology(中国矿业大学学报), 2007, 36(3): 283.

[8] YAO Jie, TONG Min-ming, LIU Tao(姚洁, 童敏明, 刘涛). Coal Mine Safety(煤炭安全), 2013, 44(2): 29.

[9] ZHANG Rui-gang, QIAN Jia-zhong, MA Lei(张瑞钢, 钱家忠, 马雷). Journal of China Coal Society(煤炭学报), 2009, 34(1): 33.

[10] WEI Wen-xue, LU Xin-ming, SHI Long-qing(卫文学, 卢新明, 施龙青). Journal of China Coal Society(煤炭学报), 2010, 35(5): 811.

[11] SANG Fu-ming, REN Xiu-lian, PAN Jian-xin(桑付明, 任秀莲, 潘建新). Journal of Instrumental Analysis(分析测试学报), 2009, 28(9): 1100.

[12] DING Juan-juan, JIN Bao-kang, KANG Jing-wu(丁娟娟, 金葆康, 康经武). Acta Chimica Sinica(化学学报), 2009, 67(9): 945.

[13] XIAO Guan-hui, QIN Hai, LAN He(肖光辉, 覃海, 蓝劾). Journal of Applied Optics(应用光学), 2011, 32(5): 1016.

[14] XU Xu, GAO Hong-jun, LIN Bing-cheng(许旭, 高红军, 林炳承). Journal of Instrumental Analysis(分析测试学报), 2005, 24(5): 122.

[15] SHI Feng-cheng, LI Dong-liang, FENG Guang-lin(施丰成, 李东亮, 冯广林). Tobacco Chemistry(烟草化学), 2013, 4: 56.

[16] OUYANG Ai-guo, ZHAO Zhan-you(欧阳爱国, 赵战友). Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization(中国农机化学报), 2013, 34(1): 181.

闫鹏程, 周孟然, 刘启蒙, 王瑞, 刘骏. LIF技术与PLS-DA算法联合辨识矿井涌水水源类型的研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2016, 36(9): 2858. YAN Peng-cheng, ZHOU Meng-ran, LIU Qi-meng, WANG Rui, LIU Jun. Research on the Source Identification of Mine Water Inrush Based on LIF Technology and PLS-DA Algorithm[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2016, 36(9): 2858.

LIF技术与PLS-DA算法联合辨识矿井涌水水源类型的研究

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

全站搜索

LIF技术与PLS-DA算法联合辨识矿井涌水水源类型的研究

相关论文

相关资讯

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

全站搜索