Photonics Research, 2020, 8 (6): 06000920, Published Online: May. 19, 2020   

Blind position detection for large field-of-view scattering imaging Download: 877次

Author Affiliations
Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China
Figures & Tables

Fig. 1. Schematic of our multi-target large FOV scattering imaging system via the blind target position detection. Multiple isolated targets, O1,O2,,On, behind the diffuser form a large FOV scene.

下载图片 查看原文

Fig. 2. Simulated experiments to analyze the relationship between two PSFs at different imaging distances (d0=120  mm, pixel size=4.8  μm, 600×600 pixels). The point light source was set at the optical axis (u=300,v=300), as the corresponding point where Ok located in the object plane. (a) Normalized PSFd1k with d1=17  mm. (b) Normalized PSFd2k with d2=19  mm. (c) The estimated low-density scaling vectors based on (a) and (b). The space between any two vectors vertically or horizontally is 20 pixels. The green rectangle in (b) is the matched block of the green rectangle in (a) and the enlarged arrow in (c) represents the estimated scaling vector corresponding to these two green rectangles. The blue point in (c) is the location of the light source. (d) The histogram distribution of m values extracted from all the scaling vectors in (c). Scale bar, 50 camera pixels.

下载图片 查看原文

Fig. 3. The block diagram of the scaling-vector-based detection algorithm.

下载图片 查看原文

Fig. 4. Multi-target large FOV scattering imaging system setup via the blind target position detection.

下载图片 查看原文

Fig. 5. Tests on a real scattering imaging system. (a) The multi-target mask “2FL” with the detailed parameters as the imaging targets. (b) The final large FOV reconstruction with the detected position information. (c) The captured near-field speckle with d2=17.0  mm. (d) The captured near-field speckle with d1=16.5  mm and the extracted autocorrelation of each imaging target centered by the detected locations in (e). (e) The estimated scaling vectors (shown as the red arrows) by block matching and the detected locations (shown as the blue points). The connected component analysis result is shown in the bottom right in a smaller scale. (f)–(j) As in (a)–(e) for a larger and more complex scene “01234.” Scale bar, 50 camera pixels.

下载图片 查看原文

Fig. 6. Real tests for biological scattering observation. (a) The neuron-shape mask with the detailed parameters as the imaging targets. (b) The final reconstructed scene. (c) The captured near-field speckle with d1=16.5  mm. Scale bar, 50 camera pixels.

下载图片 查看原文

Fig. 7. Real reconstructions for mask “2FL” when the spacing is decreasing from 3.25 mm to 1.5 mm. (a) The original imaging targets with detailed distance parameters. (b) The final reconstructed large FOV scenes corresponding to (a). (c) The averaged PSNRs curve between reconstructions and original targets with respect to the decreasing spacing. (d) The estimated scaling vectors and locations when spacing equals 2.75 mm as an example of reconstructions in good quality. (e) The estimated scaling vectors and locations when spacing equals 1.75 mm as an example of degraded reconstructions.

下载图片 查看原文

Table1. PSNRs Between Reconstructions and Targets

ScenesTargetsPSNR (dB)Averaged PSNR (dB)
2FL (3.5 mm)217.645918.4545
F18.5682
L19.1494
01234 (3.5 mm)017.968719.7870
124.1154
218.4623
318.3745
420.0140

查看原文

Xiaoyu Wang, Xin Jin, Junqi Li. Blind position detection for large field-of-view scattering imaging[J]. Photonics Research, 2020, 8(6): 06000920.

本文已被 5 篇论文引用
被引统计数据来源于中国光学期刊网
引用该论文: TXT   |   EndNote

相关论文

加载中...

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!