International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing, 2019, 1 (4): 045001, Published Online: Jun. 4, 2020  

The interaction between grain boundary and tool geometry in nanocutting of a bi-crystal copper

Author Affiliations
1 Center for Precision Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001,China
2 Research Center of Laser Fusion, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900,China
3 Interdisciplinary Centre for Advanced Materials Simulation, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, 44780, Germany
Abstract
Anisotropy is one central influencing factor on achievable ultimate machined surface integrity of metallic materials. Specifically, grain boundary has a strong impact on the deformation behaviour of polycrystalline materials and correlated material removal at the microscale. In the present work, we perform molecular dynamics simulations and experiments to elucidate the underlying grain boundaryassociated mechanisms and their correlations with machining results of a bi-crystal Cu under nanocutting using a Berkovich tool. Specifically, crystallographic orientations of simulated bi-crystal Cu with a misorientation angle of 44.1° are derived from electron backscatter diffraction characterization of utilized polycrystalline copper specimen. Simulation results reveal that blocking of dislocation motion at grain boundaries, absorption of dislocations by grain boundaries and dislocation nucleation from grain boundaries are operating deformation modes in nanocutting of the bi-crystal Cu. Furthermore, heterogeneous grain boundary-associated mechanisms in neighbouring grains lead to strong anisotropic machining behaviour in the vicinity of the grain boundary. Simulated machined surface morphology and machining force evolution in the vicinity of grain boundary qualitatively agree well with experimental results. It is also found that the geometry of Berkovich tool has a strong impact on grain boundary-associated mechanisms and resultant ploughing-induced surface pile-up phenomenon.
References

[1] Fang F Z, Wu H, Zhou W and Hu X T 2007 A study on mechanism of nano-cutting single crystal silicon J. Mater. Process. Technol. 184 407–10

[2] Wang Z F et al 2019 Crystal plasticity finite element modeling and simulation of diamond cutting of polycrystalline copper J. Manuf. Process. 38 187–95

[3] Zong W J, Li Z Q, Sun T, Cheng K, Li D and Dong S 2010 The basic issues in design and fabrication of diamondcutting tools for ultra-precision and nanometric machining Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 50 411–9

[4] Fang F, Xu F and Lai M 2015 Size effect in material removal by cutting at nano scale Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 80 591–8

[5] Gassilloud R, Ballif C, Gasser P, Buerki G and Michler J 2005 Deformation mechanisms of silicon during nanoscratching Phys. Status Solidi a 202 2858–69

[6] Jun S, Lee Y, Kim S Y and Im S 2004 Large-scale molecular dynamics simulations of Al(111) nanoscratching Nanotechnology 15 1169

[7] Xu F, Fang F, Zhu Y and Zhang X 2017 Study on crystallographic orientation effect on surface generation of aluminum in nano-cutting Nanoscale Res. Lett. 12 289

[8] Wang Q, Bai Q, Chen J, Su H, Wang Z and Xie W 2015 Influence of cutting parameters on the depth of subsurface deformed layer in nano-cutting process of single crystal copper Nanoscale Res. Lett. 10 396

[9] Haque M A and Saif M T A 2002 Mechanical behavior of 30–50 nm thick aluminum films under uniaxial tension Scr. Mater. 47 863–7

[10] Kaira C S, Singh S S, Kirubanandham A and Chawla N 2016 Microscale deformation behavior of bicrystal boundaries in pure tin (Sn) using micropillar compression Acta Mater. 120 56–67

[11] Alhafez I A, Brodyanski A, Kopnarski M and Urbassek H M 2017 Influence of tip geometry on nanoscratching Tribol. Lett. 65 26

[12] Yan Y D, Sun T and Liang Y C 2009 Effects of scratching directions on AFM-based abrasive abrasion process Tribol. Int. 42 66–70

[13] Yao W Z and You J H 2017 Berkovich nanoindentation study of monocrystalline tungsten: a crystal plasticity study of surface pile-up deformation Phil. Mag. 97 1418–35

[14] Kucharski S and Jarz?bek D 2014 Depth dependence of nanoindentation pile-up patterns in copper single crystals Metall. Mater. Trans. A 45 4997–5008

[15] Renner E, Gaillard Y, Richard F, Amiot F and Delobelle P 2016 Sensitivity of the residual topography to single crystal plasticity parameters in Berkovich nanoindentation on FCC nickel Int. J. Plast. 77 118–40

[16] Wang Z F, Zhang J J, ul Hassan H, Zhang J J, Yan Y D, Hartmaier A and Sun T 2018 Coupled effect of crystallographic orientation and indenter geometry on nanoindentation of single crystalline copper Int. J. Mech. Sci. 148 531–9

[17] Lin Y C and Shiu Y C 2017 Effect of crystallographic orientation on single crystal copper nanogrooving behaviors by MD method Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 89 3207–15

[18] Lin Z C and Huang J C 2008 A study of the estimation method of the cutting force for a conical tool under nanoscale depth of cut by molecular dynamics Nanotechnology 19 115701

[19] Lai M, Zhang X, Fang F, Wang Y, Feng M and Tian W 2013 Study on nanometric cutting of germanium by molecular dynamics simulation Nanoscale Res. Lett. 8 13

[20] Li J, Liu B, Luo H, Fang Q, Liu Y and Liu Y 2016 A molecular dynamics investigation into plastic deformation mechanism of nanocrystalline copper for different nanoscratching rates Comput. Mater. Sci. 118 66–76

[21] Gao Y and Urbassek H M 2016 Scratching of nanocrystalline metals: a molecular dynamics study of Fe Appl. Surf. Sci. 389 688–95

[22] Chamani M, Farrahi G H and Movahhedy M R 2017 Friction behavior of nanocrystalline nickel near the Hall-Petch breakdown Tribol. Int. 107 18–24

[23] Liu Y, Li B and Kong L 2018 A molecular dynamics investigation into nanoscale scratching mechanism of polycrystalline silicon carbide Comput. Mater. Sci. 148 76–86

[24] Zhang J, Sun T, Yan Y, Shen D and Li X 2012 Atomistic investigation of scratching-induced deformation twinning in nanocrystalline Cu J. Appl. Phys. 112 073526

[25] Zhang J J, Wang Z F, Yan Y D and Sun T 2016 Interfacedependent nanoscale friction of copper bicrystals: tilt versus twist RSC Adv. 6 59206–17

[26] Shugurov A R, Panin A V, Dmitriev A I and Nikonov A Y 2018 The effect of crystallographic grain orientation of polycrystalline Ti on ploughing under scratch testing Wear 408 214–21

[27] Dmitriev A I, Nikonov A Y, Shugurov A R and Panin A V 2019 Numerical study of atomic scale deformation mechanisms of Ti grains with different crystallographic orientation subjected to scratch testing Appl. Surf. Sci. 471 318–27

[28] AlMotasem A T, Posselt M and Bergstr?m J 2018 Nanoindentation and nanoscratching of a ferrite/austenite iron bi-crystal: an atomistic study Tribol. Int. 127 231–9

[29] Geng Y Q, Zhang J J, Yan Y D, Yu B W, Geng L and Sun T 2015 Experimental and theoretical investigation of crystallographic orientation dependence of nanoscratching of single crystalline copper PLoS One 10 0131886

[30] Foiles S M, Baskes M I and Daw M S 1986 Embedded-atommethod functions for the fcc metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt, and their alloys Phys. Rev. B 33 7983

[31] Zhang J J, Sun T, Yan Y D, Liang Y C and Dong S 2009 Molecular dynamics study of groove fabrication process using AFM-based nanometric cutting technique Appl. Phys. A 94 593–600

[32] Plimpton S 1995 Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics J. Comput. Phys. 117 1–19

[33] Stukowski A and Albe K 2010 Extracting dislocations and non-dislocation crystal defects from atomistic simulation data Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. 18 085001

[34] Henderson A 2007 ParaView guide: a parallel visualization application (Kitware Inc.)

[35] Stukowski A 2009 Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the open visualization tool Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. 18 015012

[36] Chen T, Tan L, Lu Z and Xu H 2017 The effect of grain orientation on nanoindentation behavior of model austenitic alloy Fe-20Cr-25Ni Acta Mater. 138 83–91

[37] Borc J, Sangwal K, Pritula I and Dolzhenkova E 2017 Investigation of pop-in events and indentation size effect on the (001) and (100) faces of KDP crystals by nanoindentation deformation Mater. Sci. Eng. A 708 1–10

[38] Gao Y, Brodyanski A, Kopnarski M and Urbassek H M 2015 Nanoscratching of iron: a molecular dynamics study of the influence of surface orientation and scratching direction Comput. Mater. Sci. 103 77–89

[39] Tseng A A, Kuo C F J, Jou S, Nishimura S and Shirakashi J 2011 Scratch direction and threshold force in nanoscale scratching using atomic force microscopes Appl. Surf. Sci. 257 9243–50

[40] Geng Y, Yan Y, Brousseau E B, Yu B, Qu S, Hu Z and Zhao X 2016 Processing outcomes of the AFM probe-based machining approach with different feed directions Precis. Eng. 46 288–300

Zhanfeng Wang, Tao Sun, Haijun Zhang, Guo Li, Zengqiang Li, Junjie Zhang, Yongda Yan, Alexander Hartmaier. The interaction between grain boundary and tool geometry in nanocutting of a bi-crystal copper[J]. International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing, 2019, 1(4): 045001.

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!