Power-efficient heterodyne radio over fiber link with laser phase noise robustness

Yuancheng Cai; Xiang Gao; Yun Ling; Bo Xu; Kun Qiu

doi:doi:10.3788/COL201917.110602

Chinese Optics Letters, 2019, 17 (11): 110602, Published Online: Sep. 12, 2019

Power-efficient heterodyne radio over fiber link with laser phase noise robustness Download： 660次

Yuancheng Cai Xiang Gao Yun Ling ^*Bo Xu Kun Qiu

Author Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Optical Fiber Sensing and Communications, Ministry of Education, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1. Schematic architecture of the proposed RoF link based on pre-coding-assisted power detection scheme. LD, laser diode; PC, polarization controller; OCS, optical carrier suppression; Mod, modulation; SSMF, standard single mode fiber; OS, optical splitter; LO, local oscillator; PD, photodetector; BPF, bandpass filter; ADC, analog-digital converter; DSP, digital signal processing. The later experimental setup has been simplified by omitting the wireless transmission link, whilst the BPF and power detection are conducted in digital domain.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 2. Principle diagram of the pre-coded QPSK signal with and without phase unwrapping.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 3. Spectra of transmitted pre-coded QPSK IF signal with and without phase unwrapping in the signal pre-coding after pulse-shaping case.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 4. SNR vs RRC roll-off factor curves for QPSK with and without phase unwrapping using different sequence of pulse shaping and pre-coding. PCAPS, signal pre-coding after pulse shaping; PCBPS, signal pre-coding before pulse shaping.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 5. Spectrum of received QPSK signal with phase unwrapping at the ROP of −2 dBm after the PD. Symbol rate: 625 MSymbol/s; IF center frequency: 0.625 GHz; RF center frequency: 7.5 GHz.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 6. BER vs ROP curves for 1.25 Gbps QPSK, and 2.5 Gbps square and star 16-QAM signals transmitted over 75 km fiber in the case of two LO lasers with different linewidths. Insets depict the constellation diagrams of (i) QPSK, (ii) square 16-QAM, and (iii) star 16-QAM at the ROP of −25 dBm, respectively.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 7. BER vs ROP performance comparison for QPSK signal between the proposed pre-coding-assisted power detection scheme and conventional power detection scheme after 75 km fiber transmission. Insets (i) and (ii) depict the constellation diagrams of the two schemes at the fixed ROP of −38 dBm, respectively.

下载图片查看原文

Yuancheng Cai, Xiang Gao, Yun Ling, Bo Xu, Kun Qiu. Power-efficient heterodyne radio over fiber link with laser phase noise robustness[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2019, 17(11): 110602.

Power-efficient heterodyne radio over fiber link with laser phase noise robustness Download： 660次

Fig. 2. Principle diagram of the pre-coded QPSK signal with and without phase unwrapping.

Fig. 3. Spectra of transmitted pre-coded QPSK IF signal with and without phase unwrapping in the signal pre-coding after pulse-shaping case.

Fig. 4. SNR vs RRC roll-off factor curves for QPSK with and without phase unwrapping using different sequence of pulse shaping and pre-coding. PCAPS, signal pre-coding after pulse shaping; PCBPS, signal pre-coding before pulse shaping.

Fig. 5. Spectrum of received QPSK signal with phase unwrapping at the ROP of −2 dBm after the PD. Symbol rate: 625 MSymbol/s; IF center frequency: 0.625 GHz; RF center frequency: 7.5 GHz.

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

全站搜索

Power-efficient heterodyne radio over fiber link with laser phase noise robustness Download： 660次

Fig. 2. Principle diagram of the pre-coded QPSK signal with and without phase unwrapping.

Fig. 3. Spectra of transmitted pre-coded QPSK IF signal with and without phase unwrapping in the signal pre-coding after pulse-shaping case.

Fig. 4. SNR vs RRC roll-off factor curves for QPSK with and without phase unwrapping using different sequence of pulse shaping and pre-coding. PCAPS, signal pre-coding after pulse shaping; PCBPS, signal pre-coding before pulse shaping.

Fig. 5. Spectrum of received QPSK signal with phase unwrapping at the ROP of −2 dBm after the PD. Symbol rate: 625 MSymbol/s; IF center frequency: 0.625 GHz; RF center frequency: 7.5 GHz.

相关论文

相关资讯

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

全站搜索