基于CWT的人类不同程度干扰下干旱区土壤有机质含量估算研究 下载: 1069次
CWT-Based Estimation of Soil Organic Matter Content in Arid Area Under Different Human Disturbance Degrees
1 新疆大学资源与环境科学学院/教育部绿洲生态重点实验室, 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830046
2 北京联合大学应用文理学院城市系, 北京 100083
图 & 表
图 1. 人类不同程度干扰下的土壤光谱曲线
Fig. 1. Soil spectral curves under different human disturbance degrees
下载图片 查看原文
图 2. 土壤有机质含量与光谱反射率及其变换的相关性分析。(a) I区;(b) Ⅱ区;(c) Ⅲ区
Fig. 2. Correlation analysis among soil organic matter content, spectral reflectance, and its transformation. (a) Zone Ⅰ; (b) zone Ⅱ; (c) zone Ⅲ
下载图片 查看原文
图 3. 轻度干扰区R小波系数与土壤有机质含量的相关系数图
Fig. 3. Correlation scalogram between R wavelet coefficient and soil organic matter content in mild disturbance zone
下载图片 查看原文
图 4. 中度干扰区R小波系数与土壤有机质的相关系数图
Fig. 4. Correlation scalogram between R wavelet coefficient and soil organic matter in moderate disturbance zone
下载图片 查看原文
图 5. 重度干扰区R小波系数与土壤有机质含量相关系数图
Fig. 5. Correlation scalogram between R wavelet coefficient and soil organic matter content in severe disturbance zone
下载图片 查看原文
图 6. 土壤有机质预测值与实测值散点图。(a) Ⅰ区;(b) Ⅱ区;(c) Ⅲ区
Fig. 6. Scatter plots of predicted and measured values of soil organic matter. (a) Zone Ⅰ; (b) zone Ⅱ; (c) zone Ⅲ
下载图片 查看原文
图 7. 土壤有机质含量实测值与预测值的Kriging插值图。(a) Ⅰ区;(b) Ⅱ区;(c) Ⅲ区
Fig. 7. Kriging interpolation plots of measured and predicted values of soil organic matter content. (a) Zone Ⅰ; (b) zone Ⅱ; (c) zone Ⅲ
下载图片 查看原文
表 1研究区内3类典型干扰区基本情况
Table1. Basic status of three typical disturbance zones in study area
Type | Disturbance intension | Vegetation type | Soil type | Vegetation coverage /% |
---|
Ⅰ | Mild | Native vegetation | Sierozem soil | ≥30 | Ⅱ | Moderate | Native vegetation、cash crops | Sierozem soil | 15-30 | Ⅲ | Severe | Cash crops、man-made forest | Sierozem soil | ≤15 |
|
查看原文
表 2土壤有机质含量的描述统计量
Table2. Descriptive statistics of soil organic matter content
Type | Sampleset | Number ofsamples | Minimumvalue /(g·kg-1) | Maximumvalue /(g·kg-1) | Meanvalue /(g·kg-1) | Standarddeviation /(g·kg-1) | CV |
---|
Ⅰ | Whole set | 30 | 6.507 | 14.707 | 10.257 | 2.004 | 0.195 | Calibration set | 18 | 7.952 | 14.17 | 10.344 | 1.753 | 0.169 | Validation set | 12 | 6.507 | 14.707 | 10.127 | 2.409 | 0.238 | Ⅱ | Whole set | 30 | 6.182 | 15.221 | 8.939 | 2.284 | 0.255 | Calibration set | 18 | 6.786 | 14.797 | 8.658 | 1.884 | 0.218 | Validation set | 12 | 6.182 | 15.221 | 9.36 | 2.818 | 0.301 | Ⅲ | Whole set | 30 | 3.619 | 13.107 | 7.977 | 2.297 | 0.288 | Calibration set | 18 | 3.619 | 12.133 | 7.483 | 1.935 | 0.259 | Validation set | 12 | 4.695 | 13.107 | 8.717 | 2.67 | 0.306 |
|
查看原文
表 3选择的敏感波长
Table3. Selection of sensitive wavelengths
Type | Spectral transformation | Sensitive bands /nm |
---|
Ⅰ | R | 746,762,805,1818,1824 | R′ | 619,645,715,1467,2270 | lg(1/R) | 699,762,781,800,1824 | Ⅱ | R | 436,450,508,522,545 | R′ | 407,426,1100,1634,2417 | lg(1/R) | 434,453,500,523,534 | Ⅲ | R | 536,1192,1254,1300,1555 | R′ | 418,860,1156,1822,2329 | lg(1/R) | 536,1192,1244,1256,1300 |
|
查看原文
表 4土壤有机质含量反演模型的建模集与验证集结果
Table4. Calibration and validation results of inversion model for soil organic matter content
Type | Model | Calibration set | Validation set |
---|
R2 | RRMSE | R2 | RRMSE | RRPD |
---|
Ⅰ | R | 0.372 | 1.350 | 0.335 | 2.391 | 1.183 | R′ | 0.695 | 0.908 | 0.628 | 1.589 | 1.873 | lg(1/R) | 0.441 | 1.273 | 0.486 | 1.718 | 1.352 | CWT | 0.752 | 0.848 | 0.717 | 1.132 | 2.150 | Ⅱ | R | 0.274 | 1.561 | 0.289 | 2.396 | 0.872 | R′ | 0.668 | 1.102 | 0.616 | 1.812 | 1.671 | lg(1/R) | 0.368 | 1.336 | 0.421 | 2.350 | 1.207 | CWT | 0.706 | 0.914 | 0.689 | 1.709 | 2.090 | Ⅲ | R | 0.245 | 1.474 | 0.214 | 2.491 | 0.944 | R′ | 0.624 | 1.040 | 0.582 | 2.074 | 1.548 | lg(1/R) | 0.289 | 1.397 | 0.270 | 3.443 | 0.609 | CWT | 0.652 | 1.135 | 0.630 | 1.985 | 2.013 |
|
查看原文
叶红云, 熊黑钢, 张芳, 王宁, 马利芳. 基于CWT的人类不同程度干扰下干旱区土壤有机质含量估算研究[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 2019, 56(5): 051101. Hongyun Ye, Heigang Xiong, Fang Zhang, Ning Wang, Lifang Ma. CWT-Based Estimation of Soil Organic Matter Content in Arid Area Under Different Human Disturbance Degrees[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(5): 051101.