Effects of air bubbles on underwater optical wireless communication [Invited]

Daomin Chen; Jiemei Wang; Shangbin Li; Zhengyuan Xu

doi:doi:10.3788/COL201917.100008

Chinese Optics Letters, 2019, 17 (10): 100008, Published Online: Oct. 11, 2019

Effects of air bubbles on underwater optical wireless communication [Invited] Download： 873次

Daomin Chen Jiemei Wang Shangbin Li Zhengyuan Xu ^*

Author Affiliations

CAS Key Laboratory of Wireless-Optical Communications, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1. Experimental platform with controllable bubbles for UOWC: (a) transmitter, (b) water channel with controllable bubble generation, (c) receiver of high speed visible light camera/APD.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 2. Series of gray images as bubble density increases.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 3. Series of gray images as bubble size increases.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 4. Statistical distribution model fitting of received signal intensity under different bubble density.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 5. Statistical distribution model fitting of received signal intensity under different bubble size.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 6. BER performance versus bubble density.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 7. BER performance versus bubble size.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 8. BER performance versus bubble density under different PPM modulation orders.

下载图片查看原文

Fig. 9. BER performance versus bubble size under different PPM modulation orders.

下载图片查看原文

Table1. Bubble Density and Size in Different Grades of Air Flow Rate

N×	0×	3×	6×	9×	12×	15×
Bubble Density P_Bubble	0	9–12	23–27	27–33	32–38	35–38
N×	0×	3×	6×	9×	12×	15×
Bubble Size (mm) D_Bubble	0	1.2	1.8	2.5	$> 2.8$	$> 2.8$

查看原文

Table2. Fitting Accuracy and Distribution Parameters of the Statistical Models under Different Bubble Densities

Bubble Density		0×	3×	6×	9×	12×	15×
$σ_{I, m}^{2}$		$2.32 e^{- 6}$	$6.2 e^{- 3}$	$1.1 e^{- 2}$	$1.55 e^{- 2}$	$1.83 e^{- 2}$	$2.13 e^{- 2}$
L	GoF (%)	89.3	98.2	99.0	98.3	98.1	96.8
	$μ$	$- 6.6 e^{- 7}$	$- 3.0 e^{- 3}$	$- 5.5 e^{- 3}$	$- 7.8 e^{- 3}$	$- 8.9 e^{- 3}$	$- 10 e^{- 3}$
	$σ^{2}$	$1.0 e^{- 3}$	$7.9 e^{- 2}$	$1.1 e^{- 1}$	$1.2 e^{- 1}$	$1.3 e^{- 1}$	$1.4 e^{- 1}$
G	GoF (%)	89.3	98.2	98.9	98.0	97.3	95.7
	$k$	$7.6 e^{+ 5}$	162	91	65	56	48
	$θ$	$1.3 e^{- 6}$	$6.2 e^{- 3}$	$1.1 e^{- 2}$	$1.5 e^{- 2}$	$1.8 e^{- 2}$	$2.1 e^{- 2}$
W	GoF (%)	89.1	89.2	89.7	89.4	84.7	82.9
	$β$	1.00	1.04	1.05	1.06	1.06	1.06
	$η$	1152	13.1	9.85	8.16	7.40	6.93

查看原文

Table3. Fitting Accuracy and Distribution Parameters of the Statistical Models under Different Bubble Sizes

Bubble Size		0×	3×	6×	9×	12×	15×
$σ_{I, m}^{2}$		$1.32 e^{- 6}$	$9.76 e^{- 2}$	$1.38 e^{- 1}$	$1.46 e^{- 1}$	$1.71 e^{- 1}$	$1.84 e^{- 1}$
L	GoF (%)	89.3	–	–	–	–	–
	$μ$	$- 6.6 e^{- 7}$	–	–	–	–	–
	$σ^{2}$	$1.0 e^{- 3}$	–	–	–	–	–
G	GoF (%)	89.3	5	–	–	–	–
	$k$	$7.6 e^{+ 5}$	6.4	–	–	–	–
	$θ$	$1.3 e^{- 6}$	$1.6 e^{- 1}$	–	–	–	–
W	GoF (%)	89.1	28	2.7	–	–	–
	$β$	1.00	1.10	1.11	–	–	–
	$η$	1152	3.98	3.08	–	–	–
GEVD	GoF (%)	–	91.6	89.5	86.7	75.4	67.6
	$k$	–	$- 1.0$	$- 0.9$	$- 0.8$	$- 0.8$	$- 0.8$
	$σ^{2}$	–	$3.32 e^{- 1}$	$4.1 e^{- 1}$	$4.2 e^{- 1}$	$4.7 e^{- 1}$	$4.9 e^{- 1}$
	$μ$	–	1.00	0.98	0.97	0.95	0.95

查看原文

Daomin Chen, Jiemei Wang, Shangbin Li, Zhengyuan Xu. Effects of air bubbles on underwater optical wireless communication [Invited][J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2019, 17(10): 100008.

Effects of air bubbles on underwater optical wireless communication [Invited] Download： 873次

Fig. 1. Experimental platform with controllable bubbles for UOWC: (a) transmitter, (b) water channel with controllable bubble generation, (c) receiver of high speed visible light camera/APD.

Fig. 2. Series of gray images as bubble density increases.

Fig. 3. Series of gray images as bubble size increases.

Fig. 4. Statistical distribution model fitting of received signal intensity under different bubble density.

Fig. 5. Statistical distribution model fitting of received signal intensity under different bubble size.

Fig. 6. BER performance versus bubble density.

Fig. 7. BER performance versus bubble size.

Fig. 8. BER performance versus bubble density under different PPM modulation orders.

Fig. 9. BER performance versus bubble size under different PPM modulation orders.

Table1. Bubble Density and Size in Different Grades of Air Flow Rate

Table2. Fitting Accuracy and Distribution Parameters of the Statistical Models under Different Bubble Densities

Table3. Fitting Accuracy and Distribution Parameters of the Statistical Models under Different Bubble Sizes

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

全站搜索

Effects of air bubbles on underwater optical wireless communication [Invited] Download： 873次

Fig. 1. Experimental platform with controllable bubbles for UOWC: (a) transmitter, (b) water channel with controllable bubble generation, (c) receiver of high speed visible light camera/APD.

Fig. 2. Series of gray images as bubble density increases.

Fig. 3. Series of gray images as bubble size increases.

Fig. 4. Statistical distribution model fitting of received signal intensity under different bubble density.

Fig. 5. Statistical distribution model fitting of received signal intensity under different bubble size.

Fig. 6. BER performance versus bubble density.

Fig. 7. BER performance versus bubble size.

Fig. 8. BER performance versus bubble density under different PPM modulation orders.

Fig. 9. BER performance versus bubble size under different PPM modulation orders.

Table1. Bubble Density and Size in Different Grades of Air Flow Rate

Table2. Fitting Accuracy and Distribution Parameters of the Statistical Models under Different Bubble Densities

Table3. Fitting Accuracy and Distribution Parameters of the Statistical Models under Different Bubble Sizes

相关论文

相关资讯

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

全站搜索