Recent achievements on underwater optical wireless communication [Invited] Download: 710次
Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, TeCIP Institute, 56124 Pisa, Italy
Figures & Tables
–9]." class="imgSplash img-thumbnail" style="cursor:pointer;">
下载图片 查看原文
Fig. 2. Attenuation curve at different wavelengths[10].
下载图片 查看原文
Fig. 3. Underwater wireless communication scenario.
下载图片 查看原文
Fig. 4. Attenuation curve in the visible region, at increasing water turbidity[10].
下载图片 查看原文
Fig. 5. Simulated received optical power as a function of the link distance at different values of water turbidity. Straight gray line indicates the receiver sensitivity.
下载图片 查看原文
Fig. 6. Examples of two experimental setups for underwater demonstrations in the laboratory environment[28,34].
下载图片 查看原文
Fig. 7. (a) Picture of the WHOI optical modem; (b) test node with an optical modem installed on top[23].
下载图片 查看原文
Fig. 8. Experimental setup of the sea-trial measurements (left); scheme of the UOWC modem (right)[36].
下载图片 查看原文
Fig. 9. (a) Scheme of the UOWC modem and (b) picture of one of them. The three layers contain a monitor PD, the LEDs, and the receiver[34]. (c) Experimental setup of the sea-trial measurements.
下载图片 查看原文
Table1. Comparison of the Three UWC Technologies
Parameter | Acoustic | RF Waves | Optical Waves |
---|
Link range | | | 1–100 m | Data rate | | Few Mbit/s | 1–1000 Mbit/s | Attenuation | 0.1–4 dB/km | 10–180 dB/m | 0.4–11 dB/m | Latency | High | Low | Low | Cost | High | High | Low | Size | High | High | Low |
|
查看原文
Table2. Typical Absorption and Scattering Coefficients[12]
Water Types | | | |
---|
Pure sea | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.06 | Clear ocean | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.15 | Coastal ocean | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | Turbid harbor | 0.3 | 1.9 | 2.2 |
|
查看原文
Table3. Comparison Between Optical Sources for UOWC
Parameter | LED | LD |
---|
Optical power | 1 W | 10–1000 mW | Optical bandwidth | 20–50 nm | 1–2 nm | Electrical bandwidth | 10–15 MHz | 0.6–1 GHz | Beam emission angle | 120° | 20° | Thermal management | Mildly needed | Strongly needed | Cost | Low | High |
|
查看原文
Table4. Noticeable Experimental Results for UOWC Systems from 2015
Year | Bit Rate (Mbit/s) | Distance (m) | Water | Optical Source | (nm) | Test | Modulation Format | Ref. |
---|
2015 | 10 | 70 | Clean | LED | N.A. | Ocean | OOK-NRZ | [23] | 2015 | 20 | 0.3 | Clean | Laser | Red | Water tank | OOK-NRZ | [34] | 2015 | 1450 | 4.8 | Clean | LD | 405 | Water tank | OFDM | [40] | 2015 | 2300 | 7 | Clean | LD | 520 | Water tank | OOK-NRZ | [41] | 2015 | 4800 | 5.4 | Clean | LD | 450 | Water tank | OFDM | [27] | 2016 | 1500 | 20 | Clean | LD | 450 | Water tank | OOK-NRZ | [42] | 2016 | 200 | 5.4 | Clean | μLED | 440 | Water tank | OOK-NRZ | [43] | 2016 | 125 | 4.8 | Turbid | Laser | 515 | Harbor | OOK-NRZ | [36] | 2017 | 3 | N.A. | N.A. | LED | N.A. | Water tank | N.A. | [44] | 2018 | 2700 | 34.5 | Clean | LD | 520 | Water tank | OOK-NRZ | [45] | 2018 | 10 | 10 | Turbid | LED | 470 | Harbor | Manchester | [35] | 2018 | 9700 | 2.3 | Clean | LD | RGB | Water tank | OOK-NRZ | [46] | 2019 | 30,000 | 12.5 | Clean | LD | 487 | Water tank | PAM4 | [30] | 2019 | 3000 | 1.2 | Clean | LED | Blue | Water tank | OFDM | [28] | 2019 | 500 | 100 | Clean | LD | 520 | Water tank | OOK-NRZ | [47] | 2019 | 30 | 14.7 | Clean | LD | 450 | Water tank | OOK-NRZ | [48] | 2019 | 50 | 3 | Clean | LD | 450 | Water tank | 16-QAM | [49] |
|
查看原文
Giulio Cossu. Recent achievements on underwater optical wireless communication [Invited][J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2019, 17(10): 100009.