相干差分吸收二氧化碳激光雷达仿真与误差分析
Since the middle of the 20th century, due to the greenhouse effect, the global average surface temperature has increased by 0.85 ℃ between 1880 and 2012, and larger scale temperature increases have been investigated in some regions. Atmospheric carbon dioxide, as one of the important gases causing the greenhouse effect, plays an important role in global climate change. Due to the characteristics of large emissions and easy accumulation, carbon dioxide is often used as the main indicator of energy conservation and emission reduction. Understanding the spatiotemporal distribution pattern of atmospheric CO2 concentration in different regions can help to grasp the footprint of the“source”and“sink”of CO2 gas, which is conducive to achieving emission reduction control in China and accelerating the high-quality development of green and low carbon. The traditional methods of observing CO2 concentration use various meteorological satellites equipped with passive remote sensing observation instruments to observe the global large-scale CO2 concentration. However, passive remote sensing is limited by its observation characteristics, and there are problems such as difficult measurement at night, poor detection performance in high latitude regions, vulnerability to clouds and aerosols, and insufficient near-surface CO2 observation accuracy. As one of the active remote sensing technologies, coherent differential absorption lidar technology can work all day and detect with high accuracy. Compared to ground-based or airborne CO2 column concentration observation methods, it can provide CO2 concentration profile observation results with higher resolution. This observation method combines two technical systems, i.e., optical heterodyne and differential absorption, and can achieve high sensitivity, high integration, and diversified detection of atmospheric parameters. Coherent differential absorption lidar can obtain information about the vertical profile of carbon dioxide concentration and has the ability to detect point sources, cities, and key areas with high accuracy. However, its system structure is complex, and its development is difficult in the case of limited detection energy, with relatively little research. To assist in the parameter design of the lidar hardware system and explore the detection performance of the system, we explore the impact of atmospheric and optical parameter changes on the differential optical thickness calculation and theoretically analyze the error of the system in retrieving CO2 concentration.
Differential absorption optical thickness refers to the difference in the ratio of backscatter signals at two wavelengths in the carbon dioxide differential absorption lidar detection system. It represents the difference in the two laser backscatter signals caused by the absorption of carbon dioxide molecules and the absorption effect of carbon dioxide molecules on a specific emitted laser on the detection path. Using typical optical parameters of the lidar system and the atmospheric parameters, we simulate the backscatter signals at different detection altitudes within the range of 0-3 km and calculate the differential optical thickness for different distances. By setting a certain amount of deviation for the parameter model used, we explore the impact of these parameter changes on the accuracy of differential optical thickness calculation. In the pre-research stage of a micro pulse coherent differential absorption lidar system, the results of the error estimation are of great significance for the design of hardware system parameters and the evaluation of system performance. For the inversion of carbon dioxide concentration from monopulse backscatter signals, based on the differential absorption principle, it can be approximated that the aerosol backscattering and atmospheric extinction in the atmospheric environment remain constant. As a result, the instability of differential optical thickness caused by the hardware system acquisition can be ignored. We evaluate the detection performance of the system by exploring the relative system error caused by the uncertainty of relevant parameters in the carbon dioxide concentration inversion method.
Through the simulation, we find that at different altitudes, the variation trend of differential optical thickness with the increase in wavelength offset is consistent, showing a trend of increasing first and then decreasing. This indicates that the absorption of probe laser energy at different altitudes increases first and then decreases with the increase in wavelength offset. In the altitude range of nearly 3.5 km, when the wavelength offset is less than 0.5 pm, the relative system error is less than 0.015%. As the wavelength offset increases, the relative system error of differential optical thickness at different heights also increases. At different altitudes, with the increase in temperature offset, the differential optical thickness also shows a downward trend. When the temperature deviation is less than 1 K, the relative system error of differential optical thickness for each altitude layer is less than 0.34%. The pressure measurement deviation does not have a specific impact on calculation results of differential optical thickness. Within the entire simulation range, the pressure offset has a small impact on the calculation of differential optical thickness, with an overall relative error of less than 0.008%. Aiming at the key parameters in the CO2 concentration inversion method for the coherent differential absorption lidar system, we investigate the error in CO2 concentration inversion caused by their uncertainty. The results show that the total error caused by each parameter for the system is 0.45%. If the average CO2 concentration in a certain distance is 4×10-4, the overall absolute error of the system is 1.8×10-6.
We introduce the simulation calculation and error analysis of micropulse coherent differential absorption lidar. For the typical system optical parameters and the atmospheric parameters, we conduct a simulation to obtain the backscatter signal detected by the lidar system and calculate differential optical thickness at different heights. By setting different offsets for the parameter model, we explore their impact on the accuracy of optical thickness calculation. In addition, we theoretically analyze the uncertainty errors of atmospheric parameters (atmospheric temperature, atmospheric pressure, and water vapor concentration) and the errors introduced by the wavelength drift of the lidar system for a certain altitude and distance database. In addition, the absolute errors of CO2 concentration inversion caused by these error sources are evaluated. These works are important in the pre-research stage of lidar systems, and the results of simulation calculations and error analysis are of great significance for hardware system parameter design and system performance evaluation.
1 引言
自20世纪中叶以来,受温室效应的影响,全球平均地表温度在1880年到2012年间上升了0.85 ℃[1],并且部分地区出现更大程度的变暖。大气二氧化碳(CO2)作为引起温室效应的主要气体之一,在全球气候变化中扮演重要作用。了解不同区域的大气CO2体积分数的时空分布格局,有助于掌握CO2气体“源”与“汇”的足迹,便于实现国内减排控制,加快推进我国绿色低碳的高质量发展。
高时空分辨率、高精度的CO2体积分数数据是进行气候研究的基础。传统的观测手段是利用卫星搭载被动遥感观测设备,以进行全球大尺度的CO2体积分数观测,包括欧洲航天局的ENVISAT[2]和极轨气象卫星METOP-A[3],美国NASA的EOS/Aqua[4]和OCO-2[5]卫星,日本的温室气体监测卫星GOSAT[6],以及我国CO2监测科学实验卫星TanSat[7]等。但被动遥感受限于自身观测特性,存在着夜间难测量、高纬度区域探测性能差、易受云和气溶胶影响,以及近地面CO2观测精度不足等问题。
激光雷达主动遥感技术能够很大程度上弥补以上问题。相干差分吸收激光雷达(CDIAL)技术作为主动遥感技术之一,具有对点源、城市和重点区域进行全天时、高精度探测的能力。2004年,Koch等[8-9]研究了一种测量大气CO2体积分数的高脉冲能量地基CDIAL,其利用相干探测技术获得足够高的信噪比(SNR),用于测量大气边界层中CO2的体积分数,并具有通过相干多普勒测风技术进行风廓线测量的附加功能。Gibert等[10-11]研制了一种2.0 μm CDIAL系统,用于高精度监测大气边界层中CO2体积混合比,并在2015年展示了其连续时间段内CO2浓度垂直廓线的监测结果[12],该团队[13]在2021年尝试用2.05 μm的全光纤脉冲激光源借助相干技术进行CO2体积分数和风速的测量。
国内陶小红等[14-15]在2008年对大气CO2相干探测激光雷达系统进行了仿真计算,通过估算信噪比,对系统性能及探测精度进行了分析。此外,刘豪等[16-19]对大气CO2柱浓度观测进行了研究,我国研制的全球首颗探测大气CO2体积分数的星载IPDA系统ACDL已于2022年4月成功升空,该系统可全天时获得卫星轨迹方向全球大气CO2柱浓度分布信息。2015年,韩舸等[20]研制了一台地基直接能量探测的CO2差分吸收激光雷达(DIAL),以获取时间上连续的CO2浓度垂直廓线观测结果。2021年,余赛芬[21]提出了一种基于激光雷达的光子计数分布式自由空间光谱技术,结合频率梳扫描激光源和超导纳米线单光子探测器,对大气中CO2和HDO的体积分数进行观测。
但目前对于微脉冲相干差分吸收CO2激光雷达来说,其系统结构复杂,且在探测能量有限的情况下研制难度大,因此其相关研究较少。为了能够辅助雷达硬件系统的参数指标设计,探究系统的探测性能,研究了相干激光雷达方程中参数变化对于差分光学厚度(DAOD)计算产生的影响,并对系统测量CO2体积分数的误差进行了理论分析。
2 CDIAL原理
DIAL通过发射两束对CO2气体敏感程度不同的激光脉冲,借助大气分子及气溶胶的后向散射作用,使用望远镜接收两波长的回波信号并进行处理,通过两者吸收衰减程度的不同,计算待测气体体积分数[22-23]。DIAL发射的两束激光波长相近,但CO2气体对两束激光的吸收程度相差很大,且该波段激光受其他干扰气体的影响小。因为发射间隔极短,可认为大气状况以及激光雷达系统条件等并未发生改变,故可以通过信号处理反演CO2体积分数。
结合相干探测技术,望远镜接收到的回波信号与出射激光分离出的本振光信号在光纤耦合器处混合,混合光在平衡探测器PIN管光敏面混频[24],完成光电信号转换,最终得到光电流信号,即相干信号;然后,利用采集板将信号数字化,并把接收到的电信号划分为等间隔距离门,使系统具备距离分辨的观测能力;最后,对各门频谱最大值附近的功率谱分量进行求和,其积分值表示实际大气后向散射谱功率[25]:
式中:
式中:
式中:
3 CDIAL系统仿真
3.1 CDIAL系统设计
为了实现大气CO2体积分数高分辨率、高精度探测,对CDIAL系统进行了设计。设计主要包括三大单元模块:种子激光单元模块、激光收发器单元模块、数据采集和处理单元模块。
两台种子激光器(DFB_LD)通过驱动光纤光开关(OSW)形成
本振光和大气后向散射光在光纤耦合器中混合,混合光经平衡探测器(BD)完成光电信号转换;平衡探测器输出的电信号经过滤波器的降噪处理,最终通过数字采集卡(DAQ)完成数据采集。数据采集处理模块完成对大气后向散射信号的混频、光电转换、采集和处理,并且作为系统的核心控制模块控制各个子系统以及系统整体的工作流程。
表 1. CDIAL系统参数表
Table 1. Parameters of CDIAL system
|
3.2 相干激光雷达信号仿真
根据
大气中CO2吸收系数可以根据给定的CO2体积混合比、标准大气温度压力廓线和吸收截面数据进行计算。除待测气体外,大气总的消光系数可用气溶胶消光系数和大气分子消光系数相加来表示,两者的消光系数可分别由气溶胶后向散射系数及大气分子模型参数等计算得出,结合以上参数可由激光雷达方程得到模拟的回波信号,回波信号仿真参数列于
表 2. 回波信号的仿真参数表
Table 2. Simulation parameters of echo signal
|
如
图 3. 回波信号仿真结果。(a)气溶胶后向散射系数;(b)标准大气模型;(c)CO2体积分数廓线;(d)仿真回波信号
Fig. 3. Simulation results of echo signal. (a) Aerosol backscattering coefficient; (b) standard atmospheric model; (c) CO2 volume fraction profile; (d) simulated echo signal
3.3 DAOD影响分析
差分吸收光学厚度指CO2-DIAL探测系统中两探测波长回波信号之比的差分,用来表示CO2吸收所引起的两束激光回波信号的差异,表征着CO2分子在探测路径上对特定发射激光的吸收效应,由
通过观察
3.3.1 波长漂移对DAOD计算的影响
首先波长漂移会影响CO2吸收截面的变化,进而影响接收到的回波信号强度。因此,假定大气环境参数与除波长之外的光学参数不变,便可以在发射波长一定范围内设置若干偏移量,然后计算波长偏移后的回波信号强度与DAOD,从而观察波长漂移对DAOD所产生的影响。
由差分吸收原理可知,在
由
图 5. CO2分子吸收截面随波长的变化情况
Fig. 5. Variation of CO2 molecular absorption cross section with wavelength
图 6. 不同高度处DAOD由波长偏移引入的RSE
Fig. 6. RSE introduced by wavelength shift in DAOD at different altitudes
3.3.2 温度偏差对DAOD计算的影响
温度偏差也会影响DAOD的计算,因此通过对假定的温度廓线进行温度偏移量设置,探究其对DAOD计算结果的影响以及所造成的RSE。
从
图 7. 不同高度处DAOD随温度偏移量增大的变化
Fig. 7. Variation of DAOD with increasing temperature offset at different heights
由
由
图 9. 不同高度处DAOD由温度偏差引入的RSE
Fig. 9. RSE of DAOD at different altitudes induced by temperature bias
3.3.3 压力偏差对DAOD计算的影响
本节将探究压力偏差对于DAOD的影响,与前面波长漂移及温度偏差对DAOD的影响有所不同的是,由
图 10. 不同高度处DAOD随压强偏移量增大的变化
Fig. 10. Variation of DAOD with increasing pressure offset at different heights
图 11. 不同高度处DAOD由压力偏差引入的RSE
Fig. 11. RSE of DAOD at different altitudes induced by pressure bias
综合以上各个因素可发现,在0~3.5 km范围内,当系统波长漂移小于0.5 pm时,DAOD的计算误差小于0.015%,即当大气中CO2的体积分数为4×10-4时,引入的测量误差为5.6×10-8;当温度廓线整体变化1 K时,DAOD的计算误差小于0.34%;当压力廓线整体偏差为1 hPa时,DAOD的计算误差小于0.008%,即综合引起的DAOD计算误差小于0.34%。
4 CDIAL误差分析
4.1 CDIAL随机误差
CDIAL数据采集处理模块通过光纤耦合器将本振光和大气后向散射光进行混合,二者混合后在平衡探测器PIN光电二极管光敏面进行混频,完成光电信号转换,最终得到相干信号。前文仿真得到的激光雷达回波信号较为理想,排除了噪声等各种因素的影响。与直接探测过程不同,相干探测中本振光引入的散粒噪声为主要噪声源,同时还包括电流的热噪声、背景噪声等。其中,本振光引入散粒噪声的功率远高于其他噪声,同时系统的本振光功率通常为较稳定的值。在CDIAL系统中,通常将两台种子激光器输出的本振功率调节成一致,以保证两者回波信号强度接近。通过引入相干探测单脉冲的输出信噪比[14]分析CDIAL CO2体积分数反演的随机误差。
式中:
表 3. 平衡探测器系统的参数表
Table 3. Parameters of balance detector system
|
利用仿真得到的回波信号,经过10 min的脉冲积累后,最终得到0~2 km探测高度范围内的输出信噪比,为30 dB~50 dB。
发射激光的回波功率测量会受硬件参数等方面的影响,结合仿真得到的平衡探测器输出信噪比,最终得到CO2体积分数反演的随机误差
结合图
图 12. 不同气溶胶状况下 回波输出信噪比随高度的变化
Fig. 12. SNR of echo output varies with height under different aerosol conditions
图 13. 不同气溶胶状况下CO2体积分数的随机误差随高度的变化
Fig. 13. Random error of CO2 volume fraction varies with height under different aerosol conditions
4.2 CDIAL系统误差
CDIAL在测量大气CO2体积分数时,会受到大气环境因素、仪器自身不稳定因素等多种因素的影响,因此回波信号以及反演的CO2体积分数会与真实情况存在偏差。系统接收到的回波信号经过双程路径吸收,易受大气环境的变化以及背景噪声的影响[27];在反演CO2体积分数时,需要使用温度、压力等数据,这些信息获取的精度也会对CO2体积分数的反演产生影响。因此,本节主要对这些参数的不确定性造成的CO2体积分数反演的RSE进行分析。
4.2.1 波长漂移引入误差
在3.3.1节进行波长漂移对DAOD的影响分析时已提到,探测激光波长的偏移会影响CO2气体吸收截面的计算,并且
正如与分析波长漂移对DAOD的影响时一致,以
图 14. 波长漂移引起的体积分数反演RSE
Fig. 14. RSE of volume fraction inversion caused by wavelength drift
由
4.2.2 温度不确定度引入误差
观察式(
由于随机影响、系统影响等,通常难以获取准确的温度、压力廓线数据,因而分析温度、压力测量结果偏差所导致的系统不确定度尤为重要,其不确定度为
由
由
图 15. 温度不确定度引入的体积分数反演RSE
Fig. 15. RSE of volume fraction inversion caused by temperature uncertainty
为了探究温度影响CO2体积分数反演精度的关键之处,可先探究温度对CO2分子数密度计算精度的影响。由
图 16. 温度不确定度引起的CO2分子数密度RSE
Fig. 16. RSE of CO2 molecular number density caused by temperature uncertainty
从
4.2.3 压力不确定度引入误差
探究压力不确定度引入误差的方法与温度类似,在不同压力基准之下,不同压力偏移量对CO2体积分数反演精度的影响程度也并不相同,可以像探究温度一样,针对
图 17. 压力不确定度引入的体积分数反演RSE
Fig. 17. RSE of volume fraction inversion caused by pressure uncertainty
本部分研究内容分别选取了989.25~1025.25 hPa范围内4个压力基底作为研究压力,测量不确定度对于反演精度的影响,从
当然,在这里也对压力影响CO2分子数密度计算精度的程度进行了分析(
图 18. 压力不确定度引起的CO2分子数密度RSE
Fig. 18. RSE of CO2 molecular number density caused by pressure uncertainty
4.2.4 水汽体积分数不确定度引入误差
前文在推导CO2干空气体积混合比反演方法时未考虑湿空气的大气条件。CO2干空气与干洁大气的区别主要体现在分子数密度上。同样假设空气为理想气体,其分子数密度
由混合比定义可知,大气中各气体成分的体积分数相当于其分子数密度与干空气分子数密度的比,因此可以推算得出
式中:
结合理想气体状态方程,可以推算出干空气分子数密度为
根据
由于大气中水汽体积混合比数量级跨度较大,因此,可将基准水汽体积混合比作为水汽体积分数偏移量,进而探究其测量偏差对于CO2体积分数反演精度的影响情况,如
图 19. 水汽体积混合比测量偏差引起的CO2体积分数反演RSE
Fig. 19. RSE of CO2 volume fraction caused by measurement deviation of water vapor volume mixing ratio
在大气环境中,选取正常天气条件下水汽体积混合比作为基底,比如在青岛地区夏季,当温度在25 ℃、相对湿度为50%时,一般水汽体积混合比为1.59093×10-2。由
综上所述,针对CDIAL系统反演CO2体积分数方法中出现的各个关键参数,包括大气参数、激光参数等,本节分别对它们展开了研究,分析了在获取到的回波信号一定的情况下,这些参数对CO2体积分数反演精度的影响。结果显示,各个参数对于系统造成的总误差为0.45%,当某一距离库内CO2平均体积分数为4×10-4时,以上误差源引起的总体绝对误差为1.8×10-6,最终,各误差源的总误差如
表 4. 系统总误差
Table 4. Total error of system
|
5 结论
本文开展了微脉冲CDIAL仿真计算与误差分析方面的工作。针对典型的系统光学参数、大气参数等,仿真模拟得到雷达系统探测的回波信号,进而通过计算得到不同高度处的DAOD,通过对参数模型设置不同的偏移量来探究它们对于光学厚度计算精度的影响。仿真计算的结果显示,在0~3 km的高度范围内DAOD总体计算误差小于0.1706%。结合平衡探测器相关参数,利用仿真信号,探究了系统探测过程中的信噪比与CO2体积分数的随机误差。此外,还针对某高度一定距离库,理论分析了大气参数(大气温度、大气压强和水汽体积分数)的不确定度误差以及激光雷达系统波长漂移所引入的误差,并且对这些误差源所引起的CO2体积分数反演的绝对误差进行了评估。结果表明,各误差源引起的总体CO2体积分数反演的RSE为0.45%,即当CO2的体积分数为4×10-4时,绝对误差为1.8×10-6。
本文对CDIAL系统DAOD计算和CO2体积分数反演进行了研究,这是系统预研阶段的重要环节,仿真计算与误差分析的结果对于硬件系统搭建和指标设计具有重要意义。
[2] BeirleS, PlattU, WagnerT. Global air pollution map produced by Envisat's SCIAMACHY[R]. France: European Spage Agency, 2015.
[3] Blumstein D, Chalon G, Carlier T, et al. IASI instrument: technical overview and measured performances[J]. Proceedings of SPIE, 2004, 5543: 196-207.
[4] Aumann H H, Chahine M T, Gautier C, et al. AIRS/AMSU/HSB on the Aqua mission: design, science objectives, data products, and processing systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2003, 41(2): 253-264.
[5] Canadell J G, Le Quéré C, Raupach M R, et al. Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007, 104(47): 18866-18870.
[6] Cogan A J, Boesch H, Parker R J, et al. Atmospheric carbon dioxide retrieved from the Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT): comparison with ground-based TCCON observations and GEOS-Chem model calculations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2012, 117(D21): D21301.
[7] 刘毅, 蔡兆男, 杨东旭, 等. 中国二氧化碳科学实验卫星高光谱探测仪光谱指标影响分析及优化方案[J]. 科学通报, 2013, 58(27): 2787-2789.
Liu Y, Cai Z N, Yang D X, et al. Optimization of the instrument configuration for TanSat CO2 spectrometer[J]. Science Bulletin, 2013, 58(27): 2787-2789.
[8] Koch G J, Barnes B W, Petros M, et al. Coherent differential absorption lidar measurements of CO2[J]. Applied Optics, 2004, 43(26): 5092-5099.
[9] Koch G J, Beyon J Y, Gibert F, et al. Side-line tunable laser transmitter for differential absorption lidar measurements of CO2: design and application to atmospheric measurements[J]. Applied Optics, 2008, 47(7): 944-956.
[10] Gibert F, Flamant P H, Bruneau D, et al. Two-micrometer heterodyne differential absorption lidar measurements of the atmospheric CO2 mixing ratio in the boundary layer[J]. Applied Optics, 2006, 45(18): 4448-4458.
[11] Joly L, Marnas F, Gibert F, et al. Laser diode absorption spectroscopy for accurate CO2 line parameters at 2 μm: consequences for space-based DIAL measurements and potential biases[J]. Applied Optics, 2009, 48(29): 5475-5483.
[12] Gibert F, Edouart D, Cénac C, et al. 2-μm Ho emitter-based coherent DIAL for CO2 profiling in the atmosphere[J]. Optics Letters, 2015, 40(13): 3093-3096.
[13] Lahyani J, Le Gouët J, Gibert F, et al. 2.05-µm all-fiber laser source designed for CO2 and wind coherent lidar measurement[J]. Applied Optics, 2021, 60(15): C12-C19.
[14] 陶小红, 胡以华, 赵楠翔, 等. 大气CO2相干探测激光雷达系统性能分析[J]. 量子电子学报, 2008, 25(2): 230-234.
[15] 陶小红, 胡以华, 蔡晓春. 差分吸收激光雷达探测大气CO2精度分析[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2008, 3(2): 100-103.
[16] 刘豪, 舒嵘, 洪光烈, 等. 连续波差分吸收激光雷达测量大气CO2[J]. 物理学报, 2014, 63(10): 104214.
Liu H, Shu R, Hong G L, et al. Continuous-wave modulation differential absorption lidar system for CO2 measurement[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(10): 104214.
[17] 章桦萍. 差分吸收激光雷达探测二氧化碳柱浓度的数据处理与误差分析[D]. 上海: 中国科学院上海技术物理研究所, 2019.
ZhangH P. Data processing and error analysis of carbon dioxide column concentration detected by differential absorption lidar[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019.
[18] 刘继桥, 谢杨易, 李世光, 等. 用于全球大气温室气体探测的星载激光雷达研究[J]. 红外, 2013, 34(2): 22-26, 34.
[19] Zhu Y D, Yang J X, Chen X A, et al. Airborne validation experiment of 1.57-μm double-pulse IPDA LIDAR for atmospheric carbon dioxide measurement[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(12): 1999.
[20] 韩舸, 龚威, 马昕, 等. 地基CO2廓线探测差分吸收激光雷达[J]. 物理学报, 2015, 64(24): 244206.
Han G, Gong W, Ma X, et al. A ground-based differential absorption lidar for atmospheric vertical CO2 profiling[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(24): 244206.
[21] 余赛芬. 单光子探测自由空间分布式光谱遥感技术[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2021.
YuS F. Single photon detection free space distributed spectral remote sensing technology[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2021.
[22] 刘秋武, 王晓宾, 陈亚峰, 等. 基于染料激光器的差分吸收激光雷达探测大气NO2浓度[J]. 光学学报, 2017, 37(4): 0428004.
[23] 洪光烈, 王钦, 王建宇, 等. 地基差分吸收激光雷达垂直探测大气压力初步实验[J]. 中国激光, 2020, 47(3): 0310003.
[24] 贾晓东. 1.55 μm相干测风激光雷达样机的研制[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2015.
JiaX D. Development of1.55 μm coherent wind lidar prototype[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2015.
[25] Chouza F, Reitebuch O, Groß S, et al. Retrieval of aerosol backscatter and extinction from airborne coherent Doppler wind lidar measurements[J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2015, 8(7): 2909-2926.
[26] Ku R T, Hinkley E D, Sample J O. Long-path monitoring of atmospheric carbon monoxide with a tunable diode laser system[J]. Applied Optics, 1975, 14(4): 854-861.
[27] 谢杨易, 刘继桥, 姜佳欣, 等. 大气温度、湿度和压强对星载激光雷达测量CO2浓度精度的影响[J]. 中国激光, 2012, 39(s2): s214005.
Article Outline
李因营, 陈相成, 于翠荣, 戴光耀, 吴松华. 相干差分吸收二氧化碳激光雷达仿真与误差分析[J]. 光学学报, 2024, 44(6): 0601012. Yinying Li, Xiangcheng Chen, Cuirong Yu, Guangyao Dai, Songhua Wu. Simulation and Error Analysis of Coherent Differential Absorption Carbon Dioxide Lidar[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44(6): 0601012.