Chinese Optics Letters, 2018, 16 (1): 013001, Published Online: Jul. 17, 2018  

Single-turnover and multiple-turnover measurement of phytoplankton photosynthesis parameters using variable light pulse induced fluorescence Download: 870次

Author Affiliations
1 Department of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Hefei University, Hefei 230601, China
2 State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Optical Monitoring Technology, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
Abstract
Using a measurement system based on fluorescence induced by variable pulse light, photosynthesis parameters of chlorella pyrenoidosa are obtained, employing single-turnover and multiple-turnover protocols under dark-adapted and light-adapted conditions. Under the light-adapted condition, σPSII is larger, and Fv/Fm(ST) and Fv/Fm(MT) are smaller than those of the dark-adapted condition, but the corresponding parameters possess good linear correlations. Fm(MT), Fm(MT), Fv/Fm(MT), and Fv/Fm(MT), which are measured using the multiple-turnover protocol, are larger than those of the single-turnover protocol. The linear correlation coefficient between Fm(ST) and

Phytoplankton chlorophyll fluorescence is closely related to the photosynthetic process[13" target="_self" style="display: inline;">–3]. When excited, the photosystem II (PSII) reaction center pigment P680 is oxidized and releases an electron. The electron then reduces the primary electron acceptor QA to QA, leading to the closure of the PSII reaction center and, consequently, an increase in the fluorescence yield. After QA transfers an electron to plastoquinone (PQ) and reoxidizes to QA, the reaction center reopens, and the fluorescence yield declines. Thus, the fluorescence yield reflects the electron transport state, which is the essence of photosynthesis, and photosynthetic parameters can be obtained by analyzing the chlorophyll fluorescence yield[46" target="_self" style="display: inline;">–6]. Based on this, different photosynthesis measurement techniques have been developed. Strasser[7] put forward JIP-test technique, in which the PSII photochemical reaction is reflected by fluorescence induced by continuous excitation light. While this technique is susceptible to ambient light, Schreiber[8] proposed the pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) technique based on the multiple-turnover measuring protocol. In this technique, saturation pulse light is employed to reduce all of the PQ, and modulated measurement light is used to record the induced fluorescence, from which the photosynthetic parameters can be obtained. This technique is unable to get the PSII functional absorption cross section σPSII for the low frequency of its modulated measurement light. Kolber[9] presented fast repetition rate (FRR) technology based on the single-turnover measuring protocol. This technique reduces all the QA in their single-turnover period using a single pulse light, and the fluorescence yield curve is analyzed to obtain σPSII and other photosynthetic parameters. Shi et al.[10] established a phytoplankton photosynthetic parameter measurement system based on fluorescence induced by variable light pulse, which incorporates single-turnover, relaxation, and multiple-turnover measuring protocols. This system takes QA and PQ as nodes to measure the photosynthetic process in sections, and more photosynthetic detail parameters can be obtained. Qin et al.[11] further studied the photosynthetic parameter inversion method of fast phase and relaxation fluorescence kinetics.

The essential difference between single-turnover and multiple-turnover measuring protocols is that the sites regulated by the excitation light are different. Comparisons of the photosynthetic parameters obtained, respectively by single-turnover and multiple-turnover measuring protocols have been reported. But, these studies were carried out using two different instruments, respectively, based on the single-turnover protocol (FRR technique) and the multiple-turnover measuring protocol (PAM technique)[1215" target="_self" style="display: inline;">15], or intrusively executed with the aid of electron transfer inhibitor diuron(3-[3,4-dichlorophenyl]-1,1-dimethylurea: DCMU)[16]. In this Letter, we non-intrusively measured the phytoplankton photosynthetic parameters under dark-adapted and light-adapted conditions using the same measurement system that incorporates single-turnover, relaxation, and multiple-turnover measuring protocols, and the measured parameters were compared and analyzed. The instrument that is used is established based on fluorescence induced by variable pulse light.

Hereafter, subscripts ST and MT are used to represent the parameters measured, respectively, by single-turnover and multiple-turnover measuring protocols. The parameters measured under the light-adapted condition was marked by “’” to distinguish from those of the dark-adapted condition.

For the single-turnover measuring protocol, all of the QA are reduced in their single-turnover period, and all the reaction centers are closed, leading the fluorescence yield increases to a maximum Fm(ST), and the discrete fluorescence yield curve fn that is sampled with a sampling period of Δt can be fitted by Eqs. (1)–(3) to invert σPSII, Fm(ST), the minimal fluorescence yield Fo, and the maximum PSII photochemistry quantum yield Fv/Fm(ST)[10,17]: fn=Fo+(FmFo)Cn1p1Cnp,Cn=Cn1An+InσPSII1Cn1An1pCn1An,An=An1+Cn1/σPSII.

Following the single-turnover measuring protocol, the relaxation measuring protocol is used to record the relaxation fluorescence that is caused by electron transport from QA to PQ. The average reoxidation time constant τQA can be obtained by fitting the relaxation fluorescence using Eq. (4)[10,17]: fn=Fo+(Fm(ST)Fo)exp(t/τQA).

The multiple-turnover measuring protocol reduces all the PQ, and the maximum fluorescence yield Fm(MT) can be obtained by fitting the induced fluorescence yield curve using Eqs. (1), (2), and (5), as well as σPSII, Fo, and τQA, which are obtained in the single-turnover and relaxation measuring protocols. Consequently, the maximum PSII photochemistry quantum yield Fv/Fm(MT) can be calculated[17]: An=(An1+Cn1/σPSII)exp(Δt/τQA).

The principle applies to both the dark-adapted and light-adapted conditions.

The measurement system was described in detail in Ref. [18]. The high brightness blue LED array controlled by a microcontroller unit (MCU) is employed as an excitation light[19,20]. The single-turnover measuring protocol uses a 100 μs single light pulse with an intensity of 30,000μmolquanta/m2/s. The multiple-turnover measuring protocol employs a series of light pulses with 5 μs duration at 100 μs intervals, possessing an average intensity of 2000μmolquanta/m2/s, and the excitation stays at 200 ms. The relaxation measuring protocol is composed of a series of light pulses with 0.3 μs duration at 60 μs intervals, and the excitation keeps 500 ms with an average intensity of 3μmolquanta/m2/s. The ambient light intensity for the light-adapted condition is 35μmolquanta/m2/s.

The measurement system was employed to measure the photosynthetic parameters of chlorella pyrenoidosa that were cultured in mediums with different nutrient concentrations. The nutrient concentration of the original medium was marked as one, while the nutrient concentrations of the 1000, 200, 100, 20, and 10 times diluted medium were marked as 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1, respectively. After 21 days in the culture, the photosynthetic parameters of the dark-adapted and light-adapted conditions were measured.

Under the light-adapted condition, the PSII functional absorption cross section (σPSII) was larger than that of the dark-adapted condition (σPSII) [Fig. 1(a)], and the PSII photochemistry quantum yield (Fv/Fm(ST)) was smaller than that of the dark-adapted condition (Fv/Fm(ST)) [Fig. 1(b)]. The linear correlation coefficient of σPSII and σPSII was 0.999, and that of Fv/Fm(ST) and Fv/Fm(ST) was 0.992, indicating good linear correlation.

Fig. 1. (a) PSII functional absorption cross section, (b) PSII photochemistry quantum yield, (c) minimal fluorescence yield, and (d) maximal fluorescence yield measured by the single-turnover protocol, respectively, under dark-adapted and light-adapted conditions.

下载图片 查看所有图片

The increase of the PSII functional absorption cross section under the light-adapted condition is caused by the energy transfer between PSII reaction centers, which is described by p(0<p<1). Under the light-adapted condition with stable ambient light, the light energy capture and QA reoxidation reaches a balance, and the ratio of the open and closed reaction centers reaches a stable state. Under ambient light intensity io, the proportion of open reaction centers q(io) (0<q(io)<1) can be described by Eq. (6): q(io)=σPSII(io)ioσPSII(io)io+1τQA(io),σPSII(io)=σPSII1p+pq(io),where σPSII(io) and τQA(io) are, respectively, the PSII functional absorption cross section and QA reoxidation time constant under ambient light io. Equation (7) indicates that σPSII is larger than σPSII due to the presence of energy transfer between PSII reaction centers p.

The decrease of Fv/Fm(ST) is mainly affected by the minimal fluorescence yield and maximal fluorescence yield[21]. The minimal fluorescence yield Fo is larger than Fo [Fig. 1(c)], because the ambient light closes part of the PSII reaction centers. Whereas, the maximal fluorescence yield Fm(ST) is smaller than Fm(ST) [Fig. 1(d)] because of the increase of non-photochemical quenching. Finally, the increase of Fo and decrease of Fm(ST) cause the decrease of Fv/Fm(ST).

Under the light-adapted condition, the PSII photochemistry quantum yield (Fv/Fm(MT)) was smaller than that of the dark-adapted condition (Fv/Fm(MT)) [Fig. 2(a)], and the two parameters possessed a good linear correlation with a linear correlation coefficient of 0.996.

Fig. 2. (a) PSII photochemistry quantum yield and (b) maximal fluorescence yield measured by the multiple-turnover protocol, respectively, under dark-adapted and light-adapted conditions.

下载图片 查看所有图片

The maximal fluorescence yield Fm(MT) is smaller than Fm(MT) [Fig. 2(b)], because the non-photochemical processes are activated under the light-adapted condition[22]. Meanwhile, the minimal fluorescence yield Fo is larger than Fo, as analyzed before, thus, the PSII photochemistry quantum yield Fv/Fm(MT) is smaller than Fv/Fm(MT).

The maximal fluorescence yield and PSII photochemistry quantum yield measured by the multiple-turnover protocol were larger than those of the single-turnover protocol, as shown in Figs. 3 (Fm(ST)<Fm(MT) and Fm(ST)<Fm(MT)) and 4 (Fv/Fm(ST)<Fv/Fm(MT) and Fv/Fm(ST)<Fv/Fm(MT)).

Fig. 3. Maximum fluorescence yield measured by single-turnover and multiple-turnover protocols under (a) the dark-adapted condition and (b) the light-adapted condition.

下载图片 查看所有图片

Fig. 4. PSII photochemistry quantum yield measured by single-turnover and multiple-turnover protocols under (a) the dark-adapted condition and (b) the light-adapted condition.

下载图片 查看所有图片

The increase of the maximal fluorescence yield in the multiple-turnover protocol is due to the prolonged electron occupation of site QB in QA. During the photosynthetic process, the fluorescence yield is also affected by the electron occupation of the site QB in QA, which is mainly dependent on the PQ pool size and the balance between the PQ reduction rate and reoxidation rate. In the multiple-turnover protocol, as the PQ pool becomes progressively reduced, the electron occupation of the site QB in QA is prolonged, thus leading to a larger maximal fluorescence yield[17]. Meanwhile, because the minimal fluorescence yield used in the multiple-turnover protocol is the same as that of the single-turnover protocol, the calculated PSII photochemistry quantum yield is larger than that of the single-turnover protocol.

Under the dark-adapted condition, the linear correlation coefficients for Fm(ST) and Fm(MT), as well as Fv/Fm(ST) and Fv/Fm(MT), were, respectively, 0.984 and 0.998, indicating good linear correlation. The linear relationship between Fv/Fm(ST) and Fv/Fm(MT) was described as Fv/Fm(MT)=1.18Fv/Fm(ST), which was basically consistent with the results reported by Rottgers[15] (Fv/Fm(MT)=1.21Fv/Fm(ST)). Under the light-adapted condition, the linear correlation coefficients for Fm(ST) and Fm(MT), as well as Fv/Fm(ST) and Fv/Fm(MT), were, respectively, 0.995 and 0.991, and Fv/Fm(MT)=1.36Fv/Fm(ST). While Rottgers reported that there was a non-linear relationship between Fv/Fm(ST) and Fv/Fm(MT), the reason for the inconsistency remains to be revealed. The wavelength and intensity of the ambient light, the excitation light source, the phytoplankton species, and other elements should be considered.

In conclusion, based on the variable optical pulse induced fluorescence technique, the photosynthetic parameters of chlorella pyrenoidosa are measured by single-turnover and multiple-turnover protocols under dark-adapted and light-adapted conditions, and the obtained parameters are analyzed and discussed. Compared with the parameters measured under the dark-adaptation condition, the PSII functional absorption cross section measured under the light-adapted condition is larger because of the energy transfer between PSII reaction centers, and the PSII photochemistry quantum yield is smaller because the ambient light closes part of reaction centers, and the non-photochemical quenching increases. Compared with the parameters measured in the single-turnover protocol, the maximum fluorescence yield measured in the multiple-turnover protocol is larger because of the prolonged electron occupation of the site QB in QA, consequently leading to a larger PSII photochemistry quantum yield, which is calculated using the multiple-turnover measured maximum fluorescence yield and the minimal fluorescence yield measured in the single-turnover protocol. The results and discussion in this Letter provide an important reference for the analysis and application of the photosynthetic parameters measured by single-turnover and multiple-turnover protocols.

References

[1] HillR.BendallF., Nature186, 136 (1960).

[2] PapageorgiouG., “Chlorophyll fluorescence: an intrinsic probe of photosynthesis,” in Bioenergetics of Photosynthesis (Academic Press, 1975) p. 319.

[3] KolberZ.FalkowskiP. G., Limnol. Oceanogr.38, 1646 (1993).LIOCAH0024-3590

[4] FalkowskiP.KieferD. A., J. Plankton Res.7, 715 (1985).JPLRD90142-7873

[5] BiswalA. K.DilnawazF.DavidK. A.RamaswamyN. K.MisraA. N., Luminescence16, 309 (2001).

[6] FeiL., “Study of mechanism of electron transfer of the QB site in photosystem II of higher plants,” PhD. Thesis (Dalian University of Technology, 2012).

[7] StrasserR. J.SrivastavaA., Photochem. Photobiol.61, 32 (1995).PHCBAP0031-8655

[8] SchreiberU., Photosynth. Res.9, 261 (1986).PHRSDI0166-8595

[9] KolberZ. S.FalkowskiP. G., in Proceedings of the Oceans ‘92, Mastering the Oceans Through Technology (1992), p. 637.

[10] ShiC.GaoX.YinG.ZhouZ.LuJ.HuX., Laser Optoelectron. Prog.53, 120002 (2016).

[11] QinZ.ZhaoN.YinG.ShiC.GanT.XiaoX.DuanJ.ZhangX.ChenS.LiuJ.LiuW., Acta Opt. Sin.37, 350 (2017).

[12] OsmondB.ChowW. S.WyberR.ZavaferA.KellerB.PogsonB. J.RobinsonS. A., Funct. Plant Biol.44, 985 (2017).

[13] VredenbergW.DurchanM.PrášilO., J. Photochem. Photobiol. B107, 45 (2012).JPPBEG1011-1344

[14] RöttgersR., Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap.54, 437 (2007).

[15] SuggettD. J.OxboroughK.BakerN. R.MacIntyreH. L.KanaT. M.GeiderR. J., Eur. J. Phycol.38, 371 (2003).EJPHE50967-0262

[16] SchreiberU.KriegerA., FEBS Lett.397, 131 (1996).FEBLAL0014-5793

[17] KolberZ. S.FalkowskiP. G., “Multiple protocol fluorometer and method,” U.S. Patent 6,121,053 (September,19,2000).

[18] ShiC. Y.ZhangY. J.YinG. F.ZhaoN. J.DuanJ. B.QiuX. H.FangL.XiaoX.LiuW. Q., Acta Photon. Sinica44, 5 (2015).

[19] LiZ.WangH.YuB.DingX.TangY., Chin. Opt. Lett.15, 042301 (2017).CJOEE31671-7694

[20] ZhaoR.HuangZ.LiuY.JiY., Chin. Opt. Lett.14, 070601 (2016).CJOEE31671-7694

[21] OxboroughK.MooreC. M.SuggettD. J.LawsonT.ChanH. G.GeiderR. J., Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods10, 142 (2012).

[22] HanB.HanZ.FuX., Algal Photosynthesis: Mechanisms and Models (Science Press, 2003).

Chaoyi Shi, Xianhe Gao, Gaofang Yin, Zhisong Qin, Jingbo Duan, Shuang Chen, Jun Lu. Single-turnover and multiple-turnover measurement of phytoplankton photosynthesis parameters using variable light pulse induced fluorescence[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2018, 16(1): 013001.

引用该论文: TXT   |   EndNote

相关论文

加载中...

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!