光谱学与光谱分析, 2011, 31 (9): 2462, 网络出版: 2011-11-09   

基于均值置信区间带的高光谱特征波段选择与树种识别

Hyperspectral Feature Band Selection Based on Mean Confidence Interval and Tree Species Discrimination
作者单位
浙江农林大学, 浙江省森林生态系统碳循环与固碳减排重点实验室, 环境科技学院, 浙江 临安311300
摘要
以柏木、 雷竹和无患子野外高光谱数据为基础, 在统计学理论和实践分析的基础上, 提出了利用均值置信区间带筛选树种间最佳特征区分波段及利用Manhattan距离和Min-Max区间相似度识别树种的问题。 研究结果表明: (1) 柏木与雷竹之间的最佳区分波段为358~386, 452~1 145和1 314~2 500 nm, 柏木与无患子之间的最佳区分波段为350~446, 497~527, 553~1 330, 1 355~2 400和2 436~2 500 nm, 雷竹与无患子之间的最佳区分波段为434~555, 580~1 903, 1 914~2 089, 2 172~2 457和2 475~2 500 nm; (2) 在最佳区分波段内, 同种树种间的Manhattan距离远小于异种树种间的Manhattan距离, 同种树种间的Min~Max区间相似度远大于异种树种间的Min~Max区间相似度, Manhattan距离和Min~Max区间相似度可以有效区分和识别不同类型的树种。
Abstract
In the present study, based on the leaf-level hyperspectral data of BaiMu, LeiZhu and WuHuanZi, the authors come up with two solutions through the theory of statistics; the first one is that optimal discriminating band between tree species is extracted by mean interval confidence, the other one is that tree species is discriminated by the Manhattan distance and the Min~Max interval similarity. The research results showed that (1) the optimal discriminating bands between BaiMu and LeiZhu are around 350~446, 497~527, 553~1 330, 1 355~2 400 and 2 436~2 500 nm; the optimal discriminating bands between BaiMu and WuHuanZi are around 434~555, 580~1 903, 1 914~2 089, 2 172~2 457 and 2 475~2 500 nm; the optimal discriminating bands between LeiZhu and WuHuanZi are around 434~555, 580~1 903, 1 914~2 089, 2 172~2 457 and 2 475~2 500 nm; and this result is helpful for us to find maximum difference to identifying tree species respectively. (2) In these optimal discriminating bands, we find that the Manhattan distance between the same species is far less than the different species; but the Min~Max interval similarity between the same species is far more than the different species, so this result could help us to discriminate and identify different types of tree species effectively.
参考文献

[1] SU Hong-jun, DU Pei-jun(苏红军, 杜培军). Remote Sensing Technology and Application(遥感技术与应用), 2006, 21(4): 288.

[2] De Backer S, Kempeneers P, Debruyn W, et al. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, IEEE, 2005, 2(3): 319.

[3] Guo B, Gunn S R, Damper R I, et al. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, IEEE, 2006, 3(4): 522.

[4] Martinez-Uso A, Pla F, Sotoca J M, et al. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, 2007, 45(12): 4158.

[5] Clark M L, Roberts D A, Clark D B. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2005, 96(3-4): 375.

[6] Gong P, Pu R, Biging G S, et al. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, 2003, 41(6): 1355.

[7] Lipschutz S, Lipson M. Schaum’s Outline of Theory and Problems of Probability: Schau’s Outline Series, 2000.

[8] Blum A L, Langley P. Artificial Intelligence, 1997, 97(1): 245.

[9] SUN Hui-qin, XIONG Zhang(孙惠琴, 熊璋). Journal of Fudan University(复旦学报·自然科学版), 2004, 43(5): 819.

[10] Faith D P, Minchin P R, Belbin L. Plant Ecology, 1987, 69(1): 57.

[11] LI Jun-hua, PENG Li(李俊华, 彭力). Computer Engineering and Applications(计算机工程与应用), 2008, 44(2): 74.

[12] Soman K P, Diwakar S, Ajay V. Insight into Data Mining: Theory and Practice: Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., 2006.

陈永刚, 丁丽霞, 葛宏立, 张茂震, 胡芸. 基于均值置信区间带的高光谱特征波段选择与树种识别[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2011, 31(9): 2462. CHEN Yong-gang, DING Li-xia, GE Hong-li, ZHANG Mao-zhen, HU Yun. Hyperspectral Feature Band Selection Based on Mean Confidence Interval and Tree Species Discrimination[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2011, 31(9): 2462.

本文已被 1 篇论文引用
被引统计数据来源于中国光学期刊网
引用该论文: TXT   |   EndNote

相关论文

加载中...

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!