FPXRF——偏最小二乘法定量分析土壤中的铅含量

在实验室条件下, 利用NITON XLt920型便携式X射线荧光光谱（field portable X-ray fluorescence, FPXRF）仪获取土壤样品的X射线荧光光谱数据, 并采用偏最小二乘法（PLS）建立土壤Pb含量的预测模型。模型所用的光谱范围为与土壤中Pb元素密切相关的两个波段： 10.40～10.70 keV和12.41～12.80 keV；最佳主成分数为6。模型经交互验证, 其预测结果与实测值之间的相关系数为0.966 6, 预测均方根误差(RMSEP)为0.873 2。另外为了与偏最小二乘法做比较, 还分别利用仪器直接获取的Pb含量读数以及X射线荧光光谱数据中Pb的Lα和Lβ线的强度与ICP测定值进行一元线性和多元线性回归, 相关系数分别为0.680 5和0.730 2, 均低于PLS模型的预测结果。研究表明, 相比较传统的原子吸收等测试方法, 便携式XRF仪在保证一定测试精度基础上, 具有方便、快速、无损和耗费少等优势, 可作为进一步分析前有力的筛选手段。

Abstract

In the present study, soil samples were scanned by NITON XLt920 field portable X-ray fluorescence (FPXRF)analyzer, and the relationship between the X-ray fluorescence spectra and the concentration of Pb in soil was studied. For predicating the Pb concentration in soil, a partial least square regression model (PLS)was established with 6 optimal factors and two closely relevant electron volt ranges: 10.40-10.70 keV and 12.41-12.80 keV. After cross-calibration, the correlation coefficient of value predicted by PLS model against that measured by ICP was 0.966 6, and the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP)was 0.873 2. Meanwhile, the univariate linear regression and multivariate linear regression models were also built with the correlation coefficient of 0.680 5 and 0.730 2, respectively. Obviously, the PLS method was better than the other two methods for predication. Comparing to the conventional approach of atomic absorption spectroscopy（AAS）, FPXRF has the advantages of rapidness, non-destruction and relatively low cost with the acceptable accuracy. It would be a powerful tool to decide which sample is needs for further analysis.

参考文献

[1] CHEN Tong-bin(陈同斌). Metal World(金属世界), 1999, (3): 10.

[2] CHEN Yuan-pan(陈远盘). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 1995, 15(2): 103.

[3] GUAN Ying, ZHAO Hai-yan, DING Xi-feng, et al(关颖, 赵海燕, 丁喜峰, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2007, 27(5): 1029.

[4] LI Zhong-shan(李忠山). Chinese Journal of Analysis Laboratory(分析实验室), 1998, 17(4): 73.

[5] TENG Yan-guo, NI Shi-jun, ZHANG Cheng-jiang, et al(滕彦国, 倪师军, 张成江, 等). Nuclear Technology(核技术), 2003, 26(6): 440.

[6] Clark C S, Thuppil V, Clark R, et al. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2005, 2(1): 38.

[7] Sterling D A, Lewis R D, Luke D A, et al. Environmental Research, 2000, 83(2): 174.

[8] Argyraki A, Potts P J, Ramsey M H. The Analyst, 1997, 122(8): 743.

[9] CHENG Jie-liang, SHI Zhou, ZHU You-wei(程街亮, 史舟, 朱有为). Journal of Soil and Water Conservation(水土保持学报), 2006, 20(1): 103.

[10] TANG Qi-yi, FENG Ming-guang(唐启义, 冯明光). DPS Data Processing System for Practical Statistics(实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统). Beijing: Science Press(北京：科学出版社), 2002. 35.

[11] QU Hai-bin, LIU Quan, CHENG Yi-yu(瞿海斌, 刘全, 程翼宇). Chinese J. Anal. Chem.(分析化学), 2004, 32(4): 477.

[12] WANG Hui-wen(王惠文). Partial Least Square Regression Method and Its Application(偏最小二乘回归方法及其应用). Beijing: National Defence Industry Press(北京：国防工业出版社), 1999. 45.

[13] XIE Li-juan, LIU Dong-hong, ZHANG Yu-huan, et al(谢丽娟, 刘东红, 张宇环, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2007, 27(7): 1332.

[14] LU Jia-hui, L Xin, WANG Yue-xi, et al(逯家辉, 吕昕, 王跃溪, 等). Journal of Jilin University·Science Edition(吉林大学学报·理科版), 2006, 44(3): 485.

[15] LI Jun-xia, ZHANG Hong-liang, YAN Yan-lu, et al(李君霞, 张洪亮, 严衍禄, 等). Agricultural Sciences in China(中国农业科学), 2006, 39(4): 836.

黄启厅, 周炼清, 史舟, 李震宇, 顾群. FPXRF——偏最小二乘法定量分析土壤中的铅含量[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2009, 29(5): 1434. HUANG Qi-ting, ZHOU Lian-qing, SHI Zhou, LI Zhen-yu, GU Qun. Analysis of Lead in Soil with Partial Least Square Regression (PLS) Method and Field Portable X-Ray Fluorescence (FPXRF) Analyzer[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2009, 29(5): 1434.

FPXRF——偏最小二乘法定量分析土壤中的铅含量

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

全站搜索

FPXRF——偏最小二乘法定量分析土壤中的铅含量

相关论文

相关资讯

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

全站搜索