光谱学与光谱分析, 2015, 35 (6): 1633, 网络出版: 2015-06-11  

基于线性调频Z变换的差分吸收光谱数据处理方法研究

Study on Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy Data Processing Based on Chirp-Z Transformation
作者单位
华北电力大学能源动力与机械工程学院, 河北 保定 071003
摘要
差分吸收光谱法(differential optical absorption spectroscopy, DOAS)是一种常用的污染气体监测方法, 对所监测的光谱数据去噪可以提高反演精度。 可采用傅里叶变换(fast Fourier transform, FFT)滤波法滤除光谱数据中的噪声, 但该算法本身会引入误差。 提出一种线性调频Z变换法(chirp Z transform, CZT), 通过对傅里叶变换之后的频谱进行局部细化, 能够在保留傅里叶变换滤波法去噪效果的基础上, 对算法的误差进行补偿, 从而进一步提高反演精度。 实验配置了SO2及NO2进行浓度反演, 结果表明, 直接采用相除法反演浓度时误差较大且很不稳定, 线性调频Z变换法能够获得比傅里叶变换滤波法更高的反演精度。 模拟了SO2和NO2混合气体实验, 频谱分析结果表明FFT算法无法解决特征吸收结构被扭曲、 削弱等问题, CZT算法能完成特定频段频谱的精细化重构。
Abstract
Differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) is a commonly used atmospheric pollution monitoring method. Denoising of monitoring spectral data will improve the inversion accuracy. Fourier transform filtering method is effectively capable of filtering out the noise in the spectral data. But the algorithm itself can introduce errors. In this paper, a chirp-z transform method is put forward. By means of the local thinning of Fourier transform spectrum, it can retain the denoising effect of Fourier transform and compensate the error of the algorithm, which will further improve the inversion accuracy. The paper study on the concentration retrieving of SO2 and NO2. The results show that simple division causes bigger error and is not very stable. Chirp-z transform is proved to be more accurate than Fourier transform. Results of the frequency spectrum analysis show that Fourier transform cannot solve the distortion and weakening problems of characteristic absorption spectrum. Chirp-z transform shows ability in fine refactoring of specific frequency spectrum.
参考文献

[1] The Sate Council(国务院). http://www.gov.cn/2011lh/content21825838.htm, 2011-03-16/2013-11-03.

[2] SUN You-wen, LIU Wen-qing, XIE Pin-hua, et al(孙友文, 刘文清, 谢品华, 等). Acta Physica Sinica(物理学报), 2013, 62(1): 102.

[3] LIU Wen-qing, DONG Feng-zhong, CUI Zhi-cheng(刘文清, 董凤忠, 崔志成). Optoelectronic Technology & Information(光电子技术与信息), 2002, 15(5): 1.

[4] MAO Wan-peng, CAI Xiao-shu, CHENG Zhi-hai, et al(毛万朋, 蔡小舒, 程智海, 等). Journal of Engineering Thermophysics(工程热物理学报), 2004, 25(S1): 205.

[5] LI Su-wen, XIE Pin-hua, LI Yu-jin, et al(李素文, 谢品华, 李玉金, 等). Acta Optica Sinica(光学学报), 2006, (11): 1601.

[6] LI Ya-fei, CAI Xiao-shu(李亚飞, 蔡小舒). Proceeding of the CSEE(中国电机工程学报), 2010, 30(29): 74.

[7] Stutz J, Platt U. Applied Optics, 1996, 35(30): 6041.

[8] LIU Shi-sheng, WEI Qing-nong, WANG Feng-ping, et al(刘世胜, 魏庆农, 王峰平, 等). Atmospheric Optical Journals with the Environment(大气与环境光学学报), 2009, 4(2): 118.

[9] WEI He-li, GONG Zhi-ben, MA Zhi-jun, et al(魏合理, 龚知本, 马志军, 等). Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics(量子电子学报), 2001, 18(1): 16.

[10] ZHOU Bin, LIU Wen-qing, QI Feng, et al(周斌, 刘文清, 齐峰, 等). Acta Physica Sinica(物理学报), 2001, 50(09): 1818.

[11] ZHENG Hai-ming, CAI Xiao-shu, CHEN Jun(郑海明, 蔡小舒, 陈军). Proceedings of the CSEE(中国电机工程学报), 2006, 26(18): 101.

[12] QIAN Ke-mao, LI Chuan-qi(钱克矛, 李川奇). Journal of Vibration Engineering(振动工程学报), 2000, 13(4): 136.

[13] DUAN Hu-ming, QIN Shu-ren, LI Ning(段虎明, 秦树人, 李宁). Journal of Vibration and Shock(振动与冲击), 2007, 26(11): 138.

[14] MAO Yu-wen, TU Ya-qing, XIAO Wei, et al(毛育文, 涂亚庆, 肖玮, 等). Journal of Vibration and Shock(振动与冲击), 2012, 31(21): 112.

郑海明, 李广杰, 吴浩. 基于线性调频Z变换的差分吸收光谱数据处理方法研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2015, 35(6): 1633. ZHENG Hai-ming, LI Guang-jie, WU Hao. Study on Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy Data Processing Based on Chirp-Z Transformation[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2015, 35(6): 1633.

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!