激光与光电子学进展, 2018, 55 (4): 041013, 网络出版: 2018-09-11 复制并引用该论文  本文已被引 1 次  被引通知

图 & 表

图 1. WLD的3×3邻域示意图

Fig. 1. 3×3 neighborhood diagram of WLD

下载图片 查看原文

图 2. (a) WLD和(b) AR-WLD的邻域示意图

Fig. 2. Neighborhood diagrams of (a) WLD and (b) AR-WLD

下载图片 查看原文

图 3. 不同邻域大小的差励图

Fig. 3. Differential excitation images under different neighborhood sizes

下载图片 查看原文

图 4. 部分遮挡模拟样本。(a) JAFFE库;(b) CK库

Fig. 4. Partial occluded simulation samples. (a) JAFFE database; (b) CK database

下载图片 查看原文

图 5. 不同邻域大小的识别率对比。(a) JAFFE库;(b) CK库

Fig. 5. Comparison of recognition rate of different neighborhood sizes. (a) JAFFE database; (b) CK database

下载图片 查看原文

图 6. 不同特征提取算法识别率对比。(a) JAFFE库;(b) CK库;(c) JAFFE库;(d) CK库

Fig. 6. Comparison of recognition rate of different feature extraction algorithms. (a) JAFFE database; (b) CK database; (c) JAFFE database; (d) CK database

下载图片 查看原文

图 7. 不同遮挡表情识别方法识别率对比。(a) JAFFE库;(b) CK库;(c) JAFFE库;(d) CK库

Fig. 7. Comparison of recognition rate of different occluded expression recognition methods. (a) JAFFE database; (b) CK database; (c) JAFFE database; (d) CK database

下载图片 查看原文

表 1本文算法与其他表情识别方法的识别率对比

Table1. Comparison of recognition rate of different expression recognition methods

Expression JAFFE database CK database Ref. [3] Ref. [4] Ref. [22] Proposedmethod Ref. [3] Ref. [4] Ref. [22] Proposedmethod Sadness 0.933 1.000 0.933 0.900 0.900 1.000 1.000 1.000 Happiness 1.000 1.000 0.871 1.000 0.933 1.000 1.000 0.974 Surprise 0.967 1.000 0.875 1.000 0.977 1.000 1.000 1.000 Fear 0.750 1.000 0.828 1.000 0.855 1.000 1.000 1.000 Anger 0.933 1.000 0.929 1.000 0.753 0.929 1.000 1.000 Disgust 0.862 0.933 1.000 1.000 0.959 1.000 0.900 1.000 Neural 0.867 0.933 0.933 1.000 0.941 1.000 1.000 - Average 0.902 0.980 0.910 0.986 0.903 0.990 0.986 0.996

查看原文

王晓华, 陈影, 胡敏, 任福继. 基于AR-WLD和分块相似度加权的遮挡表情识别[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 2018, 55(4): 041013. Xiaohua Wang, Ying Chen, Min Hu, Fuji Ren. Occluded Facial Expression Recognition Based on Asymmetric Region Weber Local Descriptor and Block Similarity Weighting[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018, 55(4): 041013.