激光生物学报, 2021, 30 (2): 138, 网络出版: 2021-09-01  

果皮含水量与硬度对水果激光标刻效果的影响

Effect of Fruit Peel Water Content and Hardness on the Fruit Laser Marking Quality
作者单位
温州大学机电工程学院, 温州 325035
摘要
以薄皮库尔勒香梨、硬皮山竹为材料, 研究水果自身性质及红外脉冲激光标刻参数对标刻效果及标刻后水果贮藏品质的影响, 分析了不同果皮含水量、果皮硬度和标刻速度对激光标刻颜色、线宽和连续性的影响, 并得到了在相对最优工艺参数下, 贮藏期间水果果皮标刻区域的局部形貌、标记稳定性及腐烂情况。结果表明, 果皮含水量、果皮硬度及标刻速度对薄皮、硬皮水果标刻效果均有显著影响, 且在贮藏期间, 标刻区域的标记稳定性较好, 对贮藏品质基本无影响。这为探究同种水果个体差异性和不同种水果的自身性质对激光标刻效果的影响提供了一定的借鉴意义。
Abstract
The thin-skinned Korla pear and the hard-skinned mangosteen were used as materials. To explore the effects of fruit properties and infrared pulsed laser parameters on the marking effect and fruit storage quality, the influences of fruit peel water content, fruit peel hardness and laser marking speed on the color, line width and continuity of laser labels were analyzed. And the local morphology, labeling stability and decay of fruit peel marked with optimal processing parameters during storage period were investigated. The results showed that both the water content and hardness of the fruit peel and the laser marking speed had significant influences on the marking effect of thin-skinned and hard-skinned fruits. Besides, the laser labels manifested superior stability during storage with storage quality basically unaffected. It provides a certain reference for exploring the influence of the individual differences of the same kind of fruit and the properties of different kinds of fruit on the laser marking effect.
参考文献

[1] 王晓亮. 我国食品安全问题研究综述及展望[J]. 食品安全导刊, 2018(15): 33.

[2] 嘉乐. 标签果蔬少购买[J]. 老年世界, 2011(16): 25.

[3] 王玲, 李正权, 潘太全. 澳大利亚首次在有机水果上采用激光标签[J]. 中国果业信息, 2009, 26(6): 38.

[4] 陆晓. 给水果“纹身”西班牙开发出激光标签技术[J]. 食品开发, 2010(5): 77.

[5] 松林. 食品标签的未来[J]. 健与美, 2014(9): 84.

[6] 梁容. 瑞典: 果蔬试用环保激光标签[J]. 中国果业信息, 2017, 34(6): 37.

[7] ETXEBERRIA E, MILLER W M, ACHOR D. Anatomical and morphological characteristics of laser etching depressions for fruit labeling[J]. Horttechnology, 2006, 16(3): 527-532.

[8] YUK H G, WARREN B R, SCHNEIDER K R. Infiltration and survival of Salmonella spp. on tomato surfaces labeled using a low-energy carbon dioxide laser device[J]. Horttechnology, 2007, 17(1): 67-71.

[9] SOOD P, FERENCE C, NARCISO J, et al. Laser etching: a novel technology to label florida grapefruit[J]. Horttechnology, 2009, 19(3): 504-510.

[10] ETXEBERRIA E, NARCISO C, SOOD P, et al. The anatomy of a laser label[C]. Jacksonville: Proceedings of Florida State Horticultural Society, 2009: 347-349.

[11] MARX C, HUSTEDT M, HOJA H, et al. Investigations on laser marking of plants and fruits[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2013, 116(4): 436-446.

[12] MARX C, SCHULTZ M, SCHYMIK K, et al. Re-identification of superficial and sub-epidermal laser markings on plants and fruits[C]. Seogwipo: International Symposium on New Technologies for Environment Control, Energy-Saving and Crop Production in Greenhouse and Plant Factory-Greensys 2013, 2013: 709-714.

[13] 马卓, 李建美, 路长厚, 等. 激光直接标刻二维条码技术在香蕉表面上的应用研究[J]. 应用激光, 2015, 35(1): 88-92.

[14] 周博, 徐浩元, 吴杨. 水果表面二维码标刻激光系统研究[J]. 农业科技与装备, 2017(7): 31-32.

[15] 武玉松, 李建美, 路长厚, 等. 激光参数对铝合金表面标刻条码质量的影响研究[J]. 机电工程, 2014, 31(7): 865-869.

[16] 张维一. 果蔬采后生理学[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1993: 36-38.

[17] 高冬华. 土壤水分对红富士苹果果实品质的影响[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2009.

[18] 江海坤. 西瓜(Citrulls lanatus)裂果机理及其分子标记研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2010.

[19] 刘润生. 纽荷尔脐橙(Citrus sinensis Osbeck‘Newhall’)蜡质突变株系的生物学评价[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2014.

[20] 徐巧. 黄土高原丘陵区干旱山地苹果树需水规律研究[D]. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学, 2016.

[21] 潘露, 刘麒慧, 王亮, 等. 线能量密度对选区激光熔化制备316L不锈钢缺陷的影响[J]. 应用激光, 2019, 39(1): 17-23.

[22] (德)尼姆兹. 激光与生物组织的相互作用原理及应用[M]. 张镇西, 译. 3版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005: 53-78.

孙国锋, 曹宇, 薛伟, 朱德华, 刘文文. 果皮含水量与硬度对水果激光标刻效果的影响[J]. 激光生物学报, 2021, 30(2): 138. SUN Guofeng, CAO Yu, XUE Wei, ZHU Dehua, LIU Wenwen. Effect of Fruit Peel Water Content and Hardness on the Fruit Laser Marking Quality[J]. Acta Laser Biology Sinica, 2021, 30(2): 138.

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!