光谱学与光谱分析, 2021, 41 (6): 1775, 网络出版: 2021-07-16   

东北寒地水稻茎秆纤维素含量近红外光谱反演

Inversion Method for Cellulose Content of Rice Stem in Northeast Cold Region Based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy
作者单位
1 沈阳农业大学信息与电气工程学院, 辽宁 沈阳 110866
2 辽宁省农业信息化工程技术研究中心, 辽宁 沈阳 110866
摘要
在水稻抗倒伏育种中, 水稻茎秆纤维素含量作为重要的作物性状表现型数据, 用传统方法获取时受人力成本和时间成本的约束, 采集群体大小有限。 利用高光谱技术能够实现对作物性状信息的快速、 无损检测。 为探究水稻茎秆纤维素含量近红外光谱反演模型, 以田间小区试验的方式, 采集水稻灌浆期至成熟期茎秆基部倒2、 3节作为实验样本, 并在实验室内使用NIRQuest512型号高光谱仪测得茎秆近红外反射光谱数据; 采用标准变量正态变换(SNV)、 连续小波变换(CWT)及两种方法结合(SNV-CWT)对原始近红外光谱进行预处理, 经对比分析, 原始光谱经SNV处理后再通过CWT对应6尺度分解最优, 然后采用联合区间偏最小二乘法(SiPLS)、 迭代保留信息变量法(IRIV)对最优预处理(SNV-CWT)的光谱特征曲线进行光谱特征变量筛选, 分别提取了64个和16个特征变量; 为优化模型并提高其模型精度, 采用IRIV算法对SiPLS所选的特征变量进行二次筛选, 得到6个特征变量, 特征波长为1 200, 1 207, 1 325, 1 470, 1 482和1 492 nm, 最后基于优选出的特征变量分别建立水稻茎秆纤维素含量的支持向量机回归(εSVR)和核极限学习机(KELM)预测模型, 模型参数(惩罚系数C, 核函数系数γ和不敏感参数ε)分别采用灰狼算法(GWO)、 差分进化灰狼算法(DEGWO)和自适应差分进化灰狼算法(SaDEGWO)进行优化选择。 结果表明, 采用SNV-CWT方法光谱预处理后, 经SiPLS-IRIV方法筛选的特征变量构建的SaDEGWO优化的SVR模型精度最高, 模型参数C, γ, ε分别为302.838 2, 0.087 7, 0.070 8, 测试集的决定性系数(R2p)为0.880, 均方根误差(RMSEP)为15.22 mg·g-1, 剩余预测残差(RPD)为2.91, 表明模型具有较好的预测能力, 可为水稻茎秆纤维素含量预测提供参考。
Abstract
In lodging resistance breeding of rice, the cellulose content of rice stem, as an important phenotypic data of crop traits, is constrained by human and time costs, which makes the size of the collecting population limited. The rapid and non-destructive detection of crop traits information can be achieved by using hyperspectral technology. In lodging resistance breeding of rice, rice stem cellulose content is one of the important character information. In order to explore the near-infrared spectral inversion model of cellulose content in rice stem, the bottom 2 and 3 segments of rice stem base formfilling stage to maturity stage were collected as experimental samples by field plot experiment, and the stem near-infrared reflectance spectrum data were measured by NIRQuest512 hyper-spectrometer in the laboratory. Standard normal variate (SNV), continuous wavelet transform (CWT), and the combination of the two methods (SNV-CWT) were used to pretreat the original near-infrared reflectance spectrum. Through comparative analysis, it was found that the original spectrum was optimized when it is firstly processed by SNV and then decomposed by CWT at 6 scales, and then the spectral characteristic variables are screened by the synergy interval PLS (SiPLS) method and iteratively retaining informative variables (IRIV) method for the characteristic spectral curve obtained by the optimal pretreatment (SNV-CWT). 64 and 16 characteristic variables were extracted, respectively. To optimize the model and improve its accuracy, the IRIV algorithm was used to conduct secondary screening of the characteristic variables selected by SiPLS, and 6 characteristic variables were obtained with the characteristic wavelengths of 1 200, 1 207, 1 325, 1 470, 1 482 and 1 492 nm. Finally, the support vector machine regression (ε-support vector machine regression, εSVR) and the kernel-based extreme learning machine (KELM) prediction model were established based on the selected characteristic variables. The model parameters (penalty coefficient C, kernel function coefficient γ and insensitive parameter ε) use grey wolf optimizer (GWO), differential evolution grey wolf optimizer (DEGWO) and self-adaptive differential evolution grey wolf optimizer (SaDEGWO) adaptive proposed in this paper for optimal selection. The results show that the SaDEGWO optimized εSVR model constructed by the characteristic variables selected by the SiPLS-IRIV method after spectral pretreatment with SNV-CWT method has the highest accuracy. The model parameters C, γ, ε are 302.838 2, 0.087 7, 0.070 8, respectively, and the coefficient of determination (R2p) of the test set is 0.880. The root-mean-square error (RMSEP) of the test set is 15.22 mg·g-1, residual predictive deviation (RPD) is 2.91. It indicates that the model has the good predictive ability, and this method can provide a reference for the prediction of cellulose content in rice stems.
参考文献

[1] Zhang B, Zhou Y. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2011, 53(2): 136.

[2] DU Juan, AN Dong, XIA Tian, et al(杜 娟, 安 东, 夏 田, 等). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2013, 33(12). 3207.

[3] Diallo A A, Yang Z L, et al. Int. J. Agric. & Biol. Eng., 2019, 12(2): 166.

[4] Huang J, Li Y, Wang Y, et al. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2017, 10(1): 294.

[5] Huang C, Han L, Liu X, et al. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2010, 33(2): 114.

[6] SHU Mei-yan, GU Xiao-he, SUN Lin, et al(束美艳, 顾晓鹤, 孙 林, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2019, 35(4): 168.

[7] YU Lei, ZHANG Tao, ZHU Ya-xing, et al(于 雷, 章 涛, 朱亚星, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2018, 34(16): 148.

[8] Mirjalili S, Mirjalili S M, Lewis A. Advances in Engineering Software, 2014, 69: 46.

[9] SUN Jun, MO Yun-nan, DAI Chun-xia, et al(孙 俊, 莫云南, 戴春霞, 等). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报), 2018, 34(14): 188.

[10] Li M Q, Xu L P, Xu N, et al. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 21: 1.

[11] Malley D F, Mcclure C, Martin P D, et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2005, 36: 4.

[12] LíviaR C, Gustavo H D T, Flaviana R M, et al. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2019, 224: 115186.

徐博, 许童羽, 于丰华, 张国圣, 冯帅, 郭忠辉, 周长献. 东北寒地水稻茎秆纤维素含量近红外光谱反演[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2021, 41(6): 1775. XU Bo, XU Tong-yu, YU Feng-hua, ZHANG Guo-sheng, FENG Shuai, GUO Zhong-hui, ZHOU Chang-xian. Inversion Method for Cellulose Content of Rice Stem in Northeast Cold Region Based on Near Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2021, 41(6): 1775.

本文已被 1 篇论文引用
被引统计数据来源于中国光学期刊网
引用该论文: TXT   |   EndNote

相关论文

加载中...

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!